Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #60322
| From | Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 |
| Date | 2013-11-23 22:51 +0100 |
| Organization | None |
| References | <l6povp$ndp$1@speranza.aioe.org> <l6pqs8$8b4$1@ger.gmane.org> <5290C30D.5060604@rece.vub.ac.be> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3101.1385243464.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Antoon Pardon wrote: > Op 23-11-13 10:01, Peter Otten schreef: > >> >> Your script is saying that a staticmethod instance is not a callable >> object. It need not be because >> >> Foo.foo() >> >> doesn't call the Foo.foo attribute directly, it calls >> >> Foo.foo.__get__(None, Foo)() > > I think you are burdening the programmer with implemantation details > that don't matter to him. > > IMO if Foo.foo() is legal then Foo.foo is callable. That the actual call > is delegated to Foo.foo.__get__(None, Foo) shouldn't matter. If you read the original post -- I think in this case the details do matter. What is your highlevel explanation for >> class Foo: ... @staticmethod ... def foo(): pass ... try: foo() ... except Exception as err: ... print(err) ... 'staticmethod' object is not callable >>> Foo.foo() or maybe clearer: >>> @staticmethod ... def foo(): pass ... >>> def bar(): pass ... >>> class Foo: ... foo = foo ... bar = bar ... >>> Foo.bar is bar True >>> Foo.foo is foo False How would you explain that without mentioning the descriptor protocol?
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Marco Buttu <marco.buttu@gmail.com> - 2013-11-23 09:28 +0100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-11-23 10:01 +0100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Marco Buttu <marco.buttu@gmail.com> - 2013-11-23 10:39 +0100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-11-23 16:23 +0100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Marco Buttu <marco.buttu@gmail.com> - 2013-11-23 10:39 +0100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-11-23 13:48 +0000
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-11-23 16:00 +0100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-24 08:38 +1100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-11-23 22:51 +0100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-11-24 11:30 +0100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-11-24 14:18 +0000
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-11-24 11:43 +0100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-11-24 03:45 -0700
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-11-24 12:03 +0100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-11-24 16:55 +0100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-11-24 17:08 +0100
csiph-web