Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #60306
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!dedibox.gegeweb.org!gegeweb.eu!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.000 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'argument': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'attribute': 0.07; 'python3': 0.07; '-10': 0.09; 'attributes': 0.09; 'function:': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'skip:% 20': 0.09; 'solution,': 0.09; 'wrong,': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'def': 0.12; "%s'": 0.16; 'callable': 0.16; 'foo():': 0.16; 'instance:': 0.16; 'instead).': 0.16; 'marco': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'value))': 0.16; 'valueerror': 0.16; 'who?': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '>>>': 0.22; 'import': 0.22; 'saying': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'config': 0.24; 'non': 0.24; 'script': 0.25; 'class.': 0.26; 'define': 0.26; 'pass': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'point': 0.28; 'function': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'raise': 0.29; 'skip:@ 10': 0.30; 'object.': 0.31; 'raised': 0.31; 'class': 0.32; 'skip:c 30': 0.32; 'says': 0.33; '(most': 0.33; 'skip:_ 10': 0.34; 'classes': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'add': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'method': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'positive': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'recent': 0.39; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'skip:p 20': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'name:': 0.61; 'first': 0.61; 'name': 0.63; 'body.': 0.68; 'otten': 0.84; 'not:': 0.91 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> |
| Subject | Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 |
| Date | Sat, 23 Nov 2013 16:23:53 +0100 |
| Organization | None |
| References | <l6povp$ndp$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mailman.3076.1385197282.18130.python-list@python.org> <529077E0.8090603@gmail.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7Bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | p5084ac13.dip0.t-ipconnect.de |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.7.3 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3089.1385220205.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 93 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1385220205 news.xs4all.nl 15874 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:42599 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:60306 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Marco Buttu wrote:
> On 11/23/2013 10:01 AM, Peter Otten wrote:
>
>>> In Python 3 the following two classes should be equivalent:
>> Says who?
>>
>>> >$ cat foo.py
>>> >class Foo:
>>> > def foo():
>>> > pass
>>> > print(callable(foo))
>>> >
>>> >class Foo:
>>> > @staticmethod
>>> > def foo():
>>> > pass
>>> > print(callable(foo))
>>> >
>>> >But they do not:
>>> >
>>> >$ python3 foo.py
>>> >True
>>> >False
>>>
>>
>> Your script is saying that a staticmethod instance is not a callable
>> object. It need not be because
>>
>> Foo.foo()
>
> Yes, you are right about Python 3. But in Python 2, if I am not going
> wrong, there is not solution, and I need to define a function outside
> the class. For instance:
>
> $ cat config.py
> class Configuration(object):
>
> def positiveCheck(value):
> if not value > 0:
> raise AttributeError('Must be a positive number')
>
> attributes = {
> # Attribute name: (type, checkrule)
> 'myattr': (int, positiveCheck),
> }
Just add
positiveCheck = staticmethod(positiveCheck)
at this point and everything should work in both Python 2 and 3.
Alternatively use Steven's callable_staticmethod as a decorator.
>
> def __setattr__(self, name, value):
> if not name in Configuration.attributes:
> raise AttributeError("Attribute `%s` non allowed." %name)
>
> expected_type, checkrule = Configuration.attributes[name]
> if not isinstance(value, expected_type):
> raise TypeError('The value %s is not of type %s' \
> %(value, expected_type.__name__))
> if callable(checkrule):
> print('calling %s(%s)' %(checkrule.__name__, value))
> checkrule(value)
>
> super(Configuration, self).__setattr__(name, value)
>
> The positive check works fine:
>
> >>> from config import Configuration
> >>> c = Configuration()
> >>> c.myattr = -10
> calling positiveCheck(-10)
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> ...
> AttributeError: Must be a positive number
>
> But I cannot use the method as a function:
>
> >>> Configuration.positiveCheck(-10)
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> ...
> Configuration instance as first argument (got int instance instead).
>
> Furthemore, I cannot use the method as a staticmethod, becase otherwise
> it will not be callable inside the class body.
PS: AttributeErrors should be raised when an attribute does not exist or
cannot be set; I recommend that you raise a ValueError in positiveCheck().
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Marco Buttu <marco.buttu@gmail.com> - 2013-11-23 09:28 +0100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-11-23 10:01 +0100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Marco Buttu <marco.buttu@gmail.com> - 2013-11-23 10:39 +0100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-11-23 16:23 +0100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Marco Buttu <marco.buttu@gmail.com> - 2013-11-23 10:39 +0100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-11-23 13:48 +0000
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-11-23 16:00 +0100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-24 08:38 +1100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-11-23 22:51 +0100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-11-24 11:30 +0100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-11-24 14:18 +0000
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-11-24 11:43 +0100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-11-24 03:45 -0700
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-11-24 12:03 +0100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-11-24 16:55 +0100
Re: Behavior of staticmethod in Python 3 Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-11-24 17:08 +0100
csiph-web