Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #47642

Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter?

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <jonas@geiregat.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.117
X-Spam-Level *
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.84; '*S*': 0.07; 'explicit': 0.07; 'subject:two': 0.07; '[],': 0.09; 'snippet': 0.09; 'subject:into': 0.09; 'pythonic': 0.16; 'subject:based': 0.16; 'all.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'version.': 0.19; "i've": 0.25; '&gt;': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'subject:list': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'implicit': 0.31; 'could': 0.34; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'skip:o 20': 0.38; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Message-Id:1': 0.63; 'received:195.238': 0.84; 'received:195.238.6': 0.84; 'received:belgacom.be': 0.84; 'received:isp.belgacom.be': 0.84; 'version.this': 0.84; '2013,': 0.91; 'received:172.31': 0.91; '2013': 0.98
X-Belgacom-Dynamic yes
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result AnkDAObGtlFbtJnD/2dsb2JhbAANTIM5tkiIRgMBgRGDDgkBAQEDAYEJCwMBFC5XGYgHpxySeo5YZhaCaWEDrBM
From Jonas Geiregat <jonas@geiregat.org>
Mime-Version 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4B166157-2681-4A74-A858-D08DEE1AD8D4"
Subject Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter?
Date Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:47:23 +0200
In-Reply-To <CAA=1kxRWvN8rqTZ+HQb1y5jzWgL0gAu+GBqU8b=XYsQT4pGg2g@mail.gmail.com>
To python-list@python.org
References <kp5d9e$2hf$1@panix2.panix.com> <kp5l7h$2rp$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAA=1kxRWvN8rqTZ+HQb1y5jzWgL0gAu+GBqU8b=XYsQT4pGg2g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.3010.1370933317.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 58
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1370933317 news.xs4all.nl 15927 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:49632
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:47642

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 11 Jun 2013, at 01:08, Fábio Santos wrote:

> 
> On 10 Jun 2013 23:54, "Roel Schroeven" <roel@roelschroeven.net> wrote:
> >
> > You could do something like:
> >
> > new_songs, old_songs = [], []
> > [(new_songs if s.is_new() else old_songs).append(s) for s in songs]
> >
> > But I'm not sure that that's any better than the long version.
> 
> This is so beautiful!
> 
> 

I must disagree , this is unreadable and in my honor opinion not Pythonic at all.
I've learned it's always better to be explicit then implicit, and this snippet of code does a lot in an implicit way.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Split a list into two parts based on a filter? roy@panix.com (Roy Smith) - 2013-06-10 16:34 -0400
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 08:50 +1000
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Roel Schroeven <roel@roelschroeven.net> - 2013-06-11 00:50 +0200
    Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-06-11 00:11 -0400
      Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 18:27 +0300
        Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-06-11 20:33 -0400
          Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Phil Connell <pconnell@gmail.com> - 2013-06-12 07:32 +0100
            Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-06-12 07:39 -0400
              Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-06-12 12:51 +0100
              Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2013-06-12 15:06 +0300
              Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-06-12 14:07 -0400
          Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2013-06-12 19:28 +0300
          Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-06-12 17:57 +0100
          Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-06-12 14:47 -0400
          Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-06-13 10:43 +0100
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2013-06-10 16:03 -0700
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-06-10 18:10 -0500
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 00:08 +0100
    Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 17:44 -0700
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 09:12 +1000
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-06-11 02:11 +0200
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-06-11 08:43 +0200
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Jonas Geiregat <jonas@geiregat.org> - 2013-06-11 08:47 +0200
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 14:48 +0100
    Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 09:37 -0700
      Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 18:05 +0100
        Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 10:23 -0700
          Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-12 03:37 +1000
            Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 11:13 -0700
          Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 19:05 +0100
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 15:22 +0100
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 18:28 +0300
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-12 03:28 +1000
    Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-06-11 20:12 -0400
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-06-11 20:13 +0200
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-06-11 20:18 +0200
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-12 04:27 +1000
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Roel Schroeven <roel@roelschroeven.net> - 2013-06-11 22:22 +0200

csiph-web