Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #47621

Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter?

Path csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'else:': 0.03; 'anyway.': 0.05; 'subject:two': 0.07; '"__main__":': 0.09; '__name__': 0.09; 'false,': 0.09; 'items)': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:into': 0.09; 'val': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'def': 0.12; 'hmm.': 0.16; 'item)': 0.16; 'item:': 0.16; 'iterable': 0.16; 'iterator': 0.16; 'itertools': 0.16; 'lambda': 0.16; 'operation,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'subject:based': 0.16; 'true:': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '>>>': 0.22; 'import': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'header:X-Complaints- To:1': 0.27; 'idea': 0.28; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'statement': 0.30; 'subject:list': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'maybe': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'basic': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'version': 0.36; 'false': 0.36; 'yield': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'skip:[ 10': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'rather': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'skip:p 20': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'remove': 0.60; 'break': 0.61; 'making': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; 'smith': 0.68; 'useful.': 0.68; 'hand': 0.80; 'song.': 0.84; 'songs': 0.91; '2013': 0.98
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de>
Subject Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter?
Date Tue, 11 Jun 2013 02:11:04 +0200
Organization None
References <kp5d9e$2hf$1@panix2.panix.com> <CAPTjJmrDNe8ASxD8xsok=-_zoDRrUZjHydYSm3G_SJy8T2a_5A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7Bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host p508489f5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
User-Agent KNode/4.7.3
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.3000.1370909462.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 73
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1370909462 news.xs4all.nl 15865 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57587
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:47621

Show key headers only | View raw


Chris Angelico wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> wrote:
>> new_songs = [s for s in songs if s.is_new()]
>> old_songs = [s for s in songs if not s.is_new()]
> 
> Hmm. Would this serve?
> 
> old_songs = songs[:]
> new_songs = [songs.remove(s) or s for s in songs if s.is_new()]
> 
> Python doesn't, AFAIK, have a "destructive remove and return"
> operation, and del is a statement rather than an expression/operator,
> but maybe this basic idea could be refined into something more useful.
> It guarantees to call is_new only once per song.
> 
> The iterator version strikes my fancy. Maybe this isn't of use to you,
> but I'm going to try my hand at making one anyway.

> >>> def iterpartition(pred,it):
>         """Partition an iterable based on a predicate.
> 
>         Returns two iterables, for those with pred False and those 
True."""
>         falses,trues=[],[]
>         it=iter(it)
>         def get_false():
>                 while True:
>                         if falses: yield falses.pop(0)
>                         else:
>                                 while True:
>                                         val=next(it)
>                                         if pred(val): trues.append(val)
>                                         else: break
>                                 yield val
>         def get_true():
>                 while True:
>                         if trues: yield trues.pop(0)
>                         else:
>                                 while True:
>                                         val=next(it)
>                                         if not pred(val): 
falses.append(val)
>                                         else: break
>                                 yield val
>         return get_false(),get_true()

An alternative implementation, based on itertools.tee:

import itertools

def partition(items, predicate=bool):
    a, b = itertools.tee((predicate(item), item) for item in items)
    return ((item for pred, item in a if not pred),
            (item for pred, item in b if pred))

if __name__ == "__main__":
    false, true = partition(range(10), lambda item: item % 2)
    print(list(false))
    print(list(true))

    def echo_odd(item):
        print("checking", item)
        return item % 2

    false, true = partition(range(10), echo_odd)

    print("FALSE", [next(false) for _ in range(3)])
    print("TRUE", next(true))
    print("FALSE", list(false))
    print("TRUE", list(true))

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Split a list into two parts based on a filter? roy@panix.com (Roy Smith) - 2013-06-10 16:34 -0400
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 08:50 +1000
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Roel Schroeven <roel@roelschroeven.net> - 2013-06-11 00:50 +0200
    Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-06-11 00:11 -0400
      Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 18:27 +0300
        Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-06-11 20:33 -0400
          Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Phil Connell <pconnell@gmail.com> - 2013-06-12 07:32 +0100
            Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-06-12 07:39 -0400
              Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-06-12 12:51 +0100
              Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2013-06-12 15:06 +0300
              Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-06-12 14:07 -0400
          Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2013-06-12 19:28 +0300
          Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-06-12 17:57 +0100
          Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-06-12 14:47 -0400
          Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-06-13 10:43 +0100
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2013-06-10 16:03 -0700
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-06-10 18:10 -0500
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 00:08 +0100
    Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 17:44 -0700
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 09:12 +1000
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-06-11 02:11 +0200
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-06-11 08:43 +0200
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Jonas Geiregat <jonas@geiregat.org> - 2013-06-11 08:47 +0200
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 14:48 +0100
    Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 09:37 -0700
      Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 18:05 +0100
        Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 10:23 -0700
          Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-12 03:37 +1000
            Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 11:13 -0700
          Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 19:05 +0100
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 15:22 +0100
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2013-06-11 18:28 +0300
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-12 03:28 +1000
    Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-06-11 20:12 -0400
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-06-11 20:13 +0200
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-06-11 20:18 +0200
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-12 04:27 +1000
  Re: Split a list into two parts based on a filter? Roel Schroeven <roel@roelschroeven.net> - 2013-06-11 22:22 +0200

csiph-web