Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #28570

Re: Looking for an IPC solution

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <gandalf@shopzeus.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.026
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.95; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'url:sourceforge': 0.03; 'python': 0.09; 'available)': 0.09; 'other,': 0.09; 'files.': 0.13; 'help?': 0.16; 'interesting:': 0.16; 'written': 0.20; 'trying': 0.21; 'programming': 0.23; 'somebody': 0.23; 'seems': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'looks': 0.26; 'implied': 0.29; 'though.': 0.29; 'probably': 0.29; 'related': 0.30; 'waste': 0.30; 'spread': 0.32; 'could': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'server': 0.35; 'fastest': 0.35; 'programming.': 0.35; 'so,': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'serve': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'alone': 0.36; 'depends': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'behind': 0.38; 'easier': 0.38; 'skip:l 20': 0.38; 'system.': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'build': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'stand': 0.61; 'deals': 0.62; 'computers': 0.69; 'received:204': 0.72; 'power': 0.74; 'increasing': 0.75; 'computers.': 0.84; 'different.': 0.84
Date Thu, 06 Sep 2012 12:13:25 +0200
From Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version 1.0
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: Looking for an IPC solution
References <mailman.9.1346440878.27098.python-list@python.org> <20120901145535.53fd8d7d2e71b880d107266b@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To <20120901145535.53fd8d7d2e71b880d107266b@gmx.net>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.288.1346926409.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 37
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1346926409 news.xs4all.nl 6897 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:56536
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:28570

Show key headers only | View raw

> Probably the fastest I/RPC implementation for Python should be
> OmniOrbpy:
>
> http://omniorb.sourceforge.net/
>
> It's cross-platform, language-independent and standard-(Corba-)
> compliant.
I don't want to use IDL though. Clients will be written in Python, and 
it would be a waste of time to write IDL files.
>
>> I have seen a stand alone cross platform IPC server before that could
>> serve "channels", and send/receive messages using these channels. But
>> I don't remember its name and now I cannot find it. Can somebody
>> please help?
> If it's just for "messaging", Spread should be interesting:
>
> http://www.spread.org/
>
> Also cross-platform & language-independent.
Looks promising. This is what I have found about it:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/35490/spread-vs-mpi-vs-zeromq


> So, it really depends on whether you are trying to build a parallel 
> system or distributed system. They are related to each other, but the 
> implied connotations/goals are different. Parallel programming deals 
> with increasing computational power by using multiple computers 
> simultaneously. Distributed programming deals with reliable 
> (consistent, fault-tolerant and highly available) group of computers.

I don't know the full theory behind distributed programming or parallel 
programming. ZMQ seems easier to use.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Looking for an IPC solution Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-31 21:04 +0200
  Re: Looking for an IPC solution Marco Nawijn <nawijn@gmail.com> - 2012-08-31 13:25 -0700
  Re: Looking for an IPC solution Marco Nawijn <nawijn@gmail.com> - 2012-08-31 13:25 -0700
  Re: Looking for an IPC solution Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-31 13:36 -0700
    Re: Looking for an IPC solution Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-31 23:10 +0200
  Re: Looking for an IPC solution Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net> - 2012-09-01 14:55 +0200
    Re: Looking for an IPC solution vasudevram <vasudevram@gmail.com> - 2012-09-03 14:43 -0700
    Re: Looking for an IPC solution Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-09-06 12:13 +0200
  Re: Looking for an IPC solution Aaron Brady <castironpi@gmail.com> - 2012-09-01 19:10 -0700
    Re: Looking for an IPC solution Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-09-06 12:00 +0200
  Re: Looking for an IPC solution Aaron Brady <castironpi@gmail.com> - 2012-09-01 19:10 -0700

csiph-web