Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.026 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.95; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'url:sourceforge': 0.03; 'python': 0.09; 'available)': 0.09; 'other,': 0.09; 'files.': 0.13; 'help?': 0.16; 'interesting:': 0.16; 'written': 0.20; 'trying': 0.21; 'programming': 0.23; 'somebody': 0.23; 'seems': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'looks': 0.26; 'implied': 0.29; 'though.': 0.29; 'probably': 0.29; 'related': 0.30; 'waste': 0.30; 'spread': 0.32; 'could': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'server': 0.35; 'fastest': 0.35; 'programming.': 0.35; 'so,': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'serve': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'alone': 0.36; 'depends': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'behind': 0.38; 'easier': 0.38; 'skip:l 20': 0.38; 'system.': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'build': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'stand': 0.61; 'deals': 0.62; 'computers': 0.69; 'received:204': 0.72; 'power': 0.74; 'increasing': 0.75; 'computers.': 0.84; 'different.': 0.84 Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 12:13:25 +0200 From: Laszlo Nagy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Looking for an IPC solution References: <20120901145535.53fd8d7d2e71b880d107266b@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20120901145535.53fd8d7d2e71b880d107266b@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 37 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1346926409 news.xs4all.nl 6897 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:56536 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:28570 > Probably the fastest I/RPC implementation for Python should be > OmniOrbpy: > > http://omniorb.sourceforge.net/ > > It's cross-platform, language-independent and standard-(Corba-) > compliant. I don't want to use IDL though. Clients will be written in Python, and it would be a waste of time to write IDL files. > >> I have seen a stand alone cross platform IPC server before that could >> serve "channels", and send/receive messages using these channels. But >> I don't remember its name and now I cannot find it. Can somebody >> please help? > If it's just for "messaging", Spread should be interesting: > > http://www.spread.org/ > > Also cross-platform & language-independent. Looks promising. This is what I have found about it: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/35490/spread-vs-mpi-vs-zeromq > So, it really depends on whether you are trying to build a parallel > system or distributed system. They are related to each other, but the > implied connotations/goals are different. Parallel programming deals > with increasing computational power by using multiple computers > simultaneously. Distributed programming deals with reliable > (consistent, fault-tolerant and highly available) group of computers. I don't know the full theory behind distributed programming or parallel programming. ZMQ seems easier to use.