Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #26339

Re: Pass data to a subprocess

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!border1.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <gandalf@shopzeus.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.009
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'frameworks': 0.05; 'memory.': 0.05; 'correct.': 0.07; 'nasty': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'thread,': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'anyway': 0.11; 'pipes': 0.16; 'processes.': 0.16; 'return,': 0.16; 'module': 0.19; 'sorry,': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'seems': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'wrote': 0.26; 'run': 0.28; 'servers.': 0.29; 'surprised': 0.29; 'usually': 0.30; 'worked': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'running': 0.32; 'subject:data': 0.33; 'another': 0.33; "can't": 0.34; 'process,': 0.35; 'expected': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'except': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'child': 0.36; 'option': 0.37; 'communicate': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'things': 0.38; 'instead': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'think': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'most': 0.61; 'between': 0.63; 'effective': 0.63; 'more': 0.63; 'talking': 0.66; 'received:204': 0.72; 'child,': 0.84
Date Wed, 01 Aug 2012 10:19:19 +0200
From Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version 1.0
To andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Pass data to a subprocess
References <CAF_E5JY5FgEJub7tNNzZEj0tri8Z7oPZUSLOLtD+5f0t7Yv+Yg@mail.gmail.com> <CAF_E5JY2sEsauXM-teW4hTHePqFCYK6z+9oLMZcjVWFyYs+gKg@mail.gmail.com> <5017EFB0.6080608@shopzeus.com> <CAF_E5JaEHxsjKoHRhZLzh+YdPU8UqKHae9efCsP7zEvm_37+2w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To <CAF_E5JaEHxsjKoHRhZLzh+YdPU8UqKHae9efCsP7zEvm_37+2w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Cc python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2809.1343809166.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 24
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1343809166 news.xs4all.nl 6854 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:50583
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:26339

Show key headers only | View raw


>
> As I wrote "I found many nice things (Pipe, Manager and so on), but
> actually even
> this seems to work:" yes I did read the documentation.
Sorry, I did not want be offensive.
>
> I was just surprised that it worked better than I expected even
> without Pipes and Queues, but now I understand why..
>
> Anyway now I would like to be able to detach subprocesses to avoid the
> nasty code reloading that I was talking about in another thread, but
> things get more tricky, because I can't use queues and pipes to
> communicate with a running process that it's noit my child, correct?
>
Yes, I think that is correct. Instead of detaching a child process, you 
can create independent processes and use other frameworks for IPC. For 
example, Pyro.  It is not as effective as multiprocessing.Queue, but in 
return, you will have the option to run your service across multiple 
servers.

The most effective IPC is usually through shared memory. But there is no 
OS independent standard Python module that can communicate over shared 
memory. Except multiprocessing of course, but AFAIK it can only be used 
to communicate between fork()-ed processes.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 10:19 +0200
  Re: Pass data to a subprocess Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-08-01 06:59 -0400
    Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 13:07 +0200
    Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 13:26 +0200
    Re: Pass data to a subprocess andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-08-01 14:25 +0100
    Re: Pass data to a subprocess Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-08-01 15:07 -0400
  Re: Pass data to a subprocess Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-01 14:16 +0000
    Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 16:32 +0200
      Re: Pass data to a subprocess Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-01 19:48 +0000
        Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-02 08:10 +0200
          Re: Pass data to a subprocess Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-02 14:29 +0000
        Re: Pass data to a subprocess Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-08-02 13:21 -0400
    Re: Pass data to a subprocess Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-01 16:42 +0200
    Re: Pass data to a subprocess andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-08-01 16:24 +0100

csiph-web