Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #105120

Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl
Date Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:09:21 +0000
Lines 26
Message-ID <mailman.278.1458234612.12893.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <nceihb$vpg$1@dont-email.me> <mailman.274.1458230151.12893.python-list@python.org> <ncekqc$vpg$6@dont-email.me> <mailman.276.1458231695.12893.python-list@python.org> <ncemdm$eav$3@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de rt3lpEzcSJDY9HnIpOzF8Qi1ynzGM0FIlFp23j6ty4Xw==
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.032
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.05; '"in': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'res': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'subject:python': 0.14; 'thu,': 0.15; '2016': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'language': 0.19; '>>>': 0.20; 'lawrence': 0.22; "python's": 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'compare': 0.27; '-0700,': 0.29; 'mode.': 0.29; 'code': 0.30; 'language.': 0.32; 'point': 0.33; 'avoiding': 0.33; "skip:' 20": 0.34; 'could': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'lines': 0.36; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'thought': 0.37; 'times.': 0.38; 'along': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'mark': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'more': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; 'mar': 0.65; 'believe': 0.66; 'subject:. ': 0.67; 'useful.': 0.72; 'smith': 0.76; 'as:': 0.79; 'pythonistas,': 0.84; 'rome,': 0.84; 'strengths': 0.84; 'ethan': 0.91; 'furman': 0.91; 'results,': 0.91
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host 80.234.129.0
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0
In-Reply-To <ncemdm$eav$3@dont-email.me>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.21
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:105120

Show key headers only | View raw

On 17/03/2016 16:36, Charles T. Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 09:21:51 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
>
>>> well, I don't want to forgo REs in order to have python's numbers be better....
>>
>> The issue is not avoiding REs, but using Python's strengths and idioms.
>>    Write the code in Python's style, get the same results, then compare
>> the times.
>
>
> Yes, your point was to forge REs despite that they are useful.
> I could have thought the search would have been better as:
>
>      'release[-.:][Rr]eq'
>
> or something else ... you're in a "defend python at all costs!" mode.
>

I believe it is more along the lines of "In Rome, do as the Romans".

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

sobering observation, python vs. perl "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 15:29 +0000
  Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 15:40 +0000
    Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-17 17:48 +0200
      Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 15:59 +0000
        Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-17 18:07 +0200
          Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:15 +0000
  Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-17 17:47 +0200
    Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:06 +0000
      Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-17 18:30 +0200
        Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:32 +0000
  Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl srinivas devaki <mr.eightnoteight@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 21:18 +0530
    Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:15 +0000
  Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2016-03-17 10:52 -0500
    Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:08 +0000
      Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-03-17 09:21 -0700
        Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:36 +0000
          Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-17 17:09 +0000
          Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-03-17 10:26 -0700
            Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 17:35 +0000
              Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-03-17 11:21 -0700
          DSLs in perl and python (Was sobering observation) Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 10:47 -0700
            Re: DSLs in perl and python (Was sobering observation) Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-17 22:22 +0000
            Re: DSLs in perl and python (Was sobering observation) MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2016-03-17 22:43 +0000
              Re: DSLs in perl and python (Was sobering observation) Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 05:57 -0700
                Re: DSLs in perl and python (Was sobering observation) Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-03-18 15:18 +0200
                Re: DSLs in perl and python (Was sobering observation) Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-03-18 14:22 +0100
                Re: DSLs in perl and python (Was sobering observation) Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 19:07 -0700
                DSL design (was DSLs in perl and python) Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 06:28 -0700
                Re: DSL design (was DSLs in perl and python) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-30 00:41 +1100
                Re: DSL design (was DSLs in perl and python) Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-03-29 16:45 +0300
                Finding methods, was Re: DSL design (was DSLs in perl and python) Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-03-29 15:51 +0200
      Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-17 18:34 +0200
        Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:42 +0000
          Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-17 19:08 +0200
            Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 17:25 +0000
              Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-03-17 17:53 +0000
                Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 10:59 -0700
                Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-17 20:53 +0200
                Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-03-17 19:06 +0000
                Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-03-17 21:11 +0200
            Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-03-17 20:47 +0000
      Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-03-18 10:26 +0100
      Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-18 22:47 +1100

csiph-web