Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Mark Lawrence Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: sobering observation, python vs. perl Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:09:21 +0000 Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de rt3lpEzcSJDY9HnIpOzF8Qi1ynzGM0FIlFp23j6ty4Xw== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.032 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.05; '"in': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'res': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'subject:python': 0.14; 'thu,': 0.15; '2016': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'language': 0.19; '>>>': 0.20; 'lawrence': 0.22; "python's": 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'compare': 0.27; '-0700,': 0.29; 'mode.': 0.29; 'code': 0.30; 'language.': 0.32; 'point': 0.33; 'avoiding': 0.33; "skip:' 20": 0.34; 'could': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'lines': 0.36; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'thought': 0.37; 'times.': 0.38; 'along': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'mark': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'more': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; 'mar': 0.65; 'believe': 0.66; 'subject:. ': 0.67; 'useful.': 0.72; 'smith': 0.76; 'as:': 0.79; 'pythonistas,': 0.84; 'rome,': 0.84; 'strengths': 0.84; 'ethan': 0.91; 'furman': 0.91; 'results,': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.234.129.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:105120 On 17/03/2016 16:36, Charles T. Smith wrote: > On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 09:21:51 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote: > >>> well, I don't want to forgo REs in order to have python's numbers be better.... >> >> The issue is not avoiding REs, but using Python's strengths and idioms. >> Write the code in Python's style, get the same results, then compare >> the times. > > > Yes, your point was to forge REs despite that they are useful. > I could have thought the search would have been better as: > > 'release[-.:][Rr]eq' > > or something else ... you're in a "defend python at all costs!" mode. > I believe it is more along the lines of "In Rome, do as the Romans". -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence