Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #15783
| Date | 2011-11-16 13:06 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From | Dave Angel <d@davea.name> |
| Subject | Re: Multiple threads |
| References | <31766634.4.1321451296410.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqcm23> <CAPTjJmoAWni4-wyKB4HgAJ5KvTbz42_BC3f22MOnugUmmXzVtA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAdqOWF=irJXFO2q2+o8jpM09GMLf8N+NTNGTOtMhwKgtG6jag@mail.gmail.com> <4EC3F298.1030604@davea.name> <CAGHENPSX25MH-GoXOERV19iXd8em=W+_owmSJi6V5GsmeV=1sg@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2777.1321466964.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 11/16/2011 12:55 PM, Michael Hunter wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Dave Angel<d@davea.name> wrote: >> On 11/16/2011 12:00 PM, Jack Keegan wrote: >> [...] Processes [...] and the OS is generally better at scheduling them than it is at >> scheduling threads within a single process. If you have multiple cores, the >> processes can really run simultaneously, frequently with very small >> overhead. [...] > > Maybe you are trying to simplify things but in a lot of cases this is > just false. In at least some operating systems these days a thread is > the basic unit that is scheduled. Processes are thread containers > that provide other things (fds, separate address space, etc.). The > comment about multiple cores can be extended to multiple threads on a > core (CMT) but applies to threads as well as processes. Switching > between processes tends to be heavier weight then switching between > threads in a process because of the needs to change the address space. > > Just because Python sucks at threads doesn't make them heavier for the OS. > > That doesn't mean you shouldn't use multiprocessing. The problem > asked about seems a good fit to me to a single python process starting > and managing a set of external converter processes. > > Michael > No response is deserved. -- DaveA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Multiple threads Eduardo Oliva <dutche@gmail.com> - 2011-11-16 05:48 -0800
Re: Multiple threads Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-11-17 00:55 +1100
Re: Multiple threads Henrik Faber <hfaber@invalid.net> - 2011-11-16 15:07 +0100
Re: Multiple threads Christian Heimes <lists@cheimes.de> - 2011-11-16 16:01 +0100
Re: Multiple threads Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2011-11-16 17:45 +0100
Re: Multiple threads Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2011-11-16 16:38 -0800
Re: Multiple threads Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2011-11-16 12:27 -0500
Re: Multiple threads Michael Hunter <tahoemph@gmail.com> - 2011-11-16 09:55 -0800
Re: Multiple threads Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2011-11-16 13:06 -0500
Re: Multiple threads Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2011-11-16 13:30 -0500
Re: Multiple threads Miki Tebeka <miki.tebeka@gmail.com> - 2011-11-16 12:50 -0800
csiph-web