Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #31946
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!nerim.net!novso.com!news2.euro.net!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <vs@it.uu.se> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.008 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'binary': 0.05; 'cache': 0.05; 'python': 0.09; '(it': 0.09; 'backwards': 0.09; 'chunks': 0.09; 'pointers': 0.09; 'times,': 0.13; ':-)': 0.13; '(but': 0.15; '(like': 0.15; 'decimal.': 0.16; 'dump': 0.16; 'simplest': 0.16; 'written.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'variables': 0.17; 'to:name :python-list@python.org': 0.20; 'trying': 0.21; 'finally,': 0.22; 'external': 0.24; 'paul': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; '---': 0.26; 'charset:iso-8859-15': 0.26; 'question': 0.27; 'converting': 0.27; '(unless': 0.29; 'once.': 0.29; 'writes:': 0.29; 'file': 0.32; 'running': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'thanks': 0.34; 'doing': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'subject: (': 0.36; 'enough': 0.36; 'rather': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'files': 0.38; 'performance': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'skip:" 10': 0.40; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'subject:-': 0.40; 'within': 0.64; 'taking': 0.65; 'reverse': 0.65; 'due': 0.66; 'records': 0.68; 'subject:Fast': 0.84; 'subject:read': 0.84; 'subject:write': 0.84; 'thing,': 0.84; 'approach.': 0.91 |
| X-SENDER-IP | [213.112.50.224] |
| X-LISTENER | [smtp.bredband.net] |
| X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered | true |
| X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result | AoYuAA/OhlDVcDLgPGdsb2JhbAANN4pOtzoBAQEBOIJSAQEBAQM4UQsYCSUPAjIUBg0GAgEBsFaDKZA2i1+GXgOSP5Zc |
| X-IronPort-AV | E=Sophos;i="4.80,637,1344204000"; d="scan'208";a="211857725" |
| Date | Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:06:46 +0200 |
| From | Virgil Stokes <vs@it.uu.se> |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| To | "python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org> |
| Subject | Re: Fast forward-backward (write-read) |
| References | <mailman.2667.1351003942.27098.python-list@python.org> <7xehkpxiw0.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> |
| In-Reply-To | <7xehkpxiw0.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2678.1351013559.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 24 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1351013559 news.xs4all.nl 6934 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:36461 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:31946 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 23-Oct-2012 18:17, Paul Rubin wrote: > Virgil Stokes <vs@it.uu.se> writes: >> Finally, to my question --- What is a fast way to write these >> variables to an external file and then read them in backwards? > Seeking backwards in files works, but the performance hit is > significant. There is also a performance hit to scanning pointers > backwards in memory, due to cache misprediction. If it's something > you're just running a few times, seeking backwards the simplest > approach. If you're really trying to optimize the thing, you might > buffer up large chunks (like 1 MB) before writing. If you're writing > once and reading multiple times, you might reverse the order of records > within the chunks during the writing phase. I am writing (forward) once and reading (backward) once. > > You're of course taking a performance bath from writing the program in > Python to begin with (unless using scipy/numpy or the like), enough that > it might dominate any effects of how the files are written. I am currently using SciPy/NumPy > > Of course (it should go without saying) that you want to dump in a > binary format rather than converting to decimal. Yes, I am doing this (but thanks for "underlining" it!) Thanks Paul :-)
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Fast forward-backward (write-read) Virgil Stokes <vs@it.uu.se> - 2012-10-23 16:31 +0200
Re: Fast forward-backward (write-read) Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-23 09:17 -0700
Re: Fast forward-backward (write-read) Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-23 09:22 -0700
Re: Fast forward-backward (write-read) Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-10-23 11:53 -0500
Re: Fast forward-backward (write-read) Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-23 09:58 -0700
Re: Fast forward-backward (write-read) Virgil Stokes <vs@it.uu.se> - 2012-10-23 19:06 +0200
Re: Fast forward-backward (write-read) rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-10-24 08:11 -0700
Re: Fast forward-backward (write-read) Virgil Stokes <vs@it.uu.se> - 2012-10-25 11:00 +0200
csiph-web