Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #31945
| Date | 2012-10-23 19:17 +0200 |
|---|---|
| From | Virgil Stokes <vs@it.uu.se> |
| Subject | Re: Fast forward-backward (write-read) |
| References | <5086AA35.4000509@it.uu.se> <5086C156.40707@tim.thechases.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2677.1351012669.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 23-Oct-2012 18:09, Tim Chase wrote: > On 10/23/12 09:31, Virgil Stokes wrote: >> I am working with some rather large data files (>100GB) that contain time series >> data. The data (t_k,y(t_k)), k = 0,1,...,N are stored in ASCII format. I perform >> various types of processing on these data (e.g. moving median, moving average, >> and Kalman-filter, Kalman-smoother) in a sequential manner and only a small >> number of these data need be stored in RAM when being processed. When performing >> Kalman-filtering (forward in time pass, k = 0,1,...,N) I need to save to an >> external file several variables (e.g. 11*32 bytes) for each (t_k, y(t_k)). These >> are inputs to the Kalman-smoother (backward in time pass, k = N,N-1,...,0). >> Thus, I will need to input these variables saved to an external file from the >> forward pass, in reverse order --- from last written to first written. >> >> Finally, to my question --- What is a fast way to write these variables to an >> external file and then read them in backwards? > Am I missing something, or would the fairly-standard "tac" utility > do the reversal you want? It should[*] be optimized to handle > on-disk files in a smart manner. Not sure about "tac" --- could you provide more details on this and/or a simple example of how it could be used for fast reversed "reading" of a data file? > > Otherwise, if you can pad the record-lengths so they're all the > same, and you know the total number of records, you can seek to > Total-(RecSize*OneBasedOffset) and write the record,optionally > padding if you need/can. At least on *nix-like OSes, you can seek > into a sparse-file with no problems (untested on Win32). The records lengths will all be the same and yes seek could be used; but, I was hoping for a faster method. Thanks Tim! :-) > > -tkc > > > > [*] > Just guessing here. Would be disappointed if it *wasn't*.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Fast forward-backward (write-read) Virgil Stokes <vs@it.uu.se> - 2012-10-23 19:17 +0200
Re: Fast forward-backward (write-read) Cousin Stanley <cousinstanley@gmail.com> - 2012-10-23 20:03 +0000
Re: Fast forward-backward (write-read) Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-10-24 01:20 -0400
Re: Fast forward-backward (write-read) Virgil Stokes <vs@it.uu.se> - 2012-10-24 09:07 +0200
Re: Fast forward-backward (write-read) Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> - 2012-10-24 09:12 +0100
csiph-web