Re: Detection of a specific sound

From	Random832 <random832@fastmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: Detection of a specific sound
Date	2015-11-03 09:57 -0500
Message-ID	<mailman.26.1446562685.8789.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References	<CAPfdVgF1erUtxgKGm9eky_q8X24L88PkFEWyTL4hqUNUvGvrzQ@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.1.1446522557.8789.python-list@python.org> <n19sgq$ppu$1@speranza.aioe.org> <s1fh3bljdbvdkovgd2vk1cevdfggbvbgsj@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> writes:

> If a fire did occur, and the inspectors find traces of wiring
> going into what was supposed to be a stand-alone detector there is
> a risk that it will be concluded that the detector had been
> tampered with and may not have been functional... And that could
> lead to all sorts of liability problems.

What about a *second* smoke detector?

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Detection of a specific sound Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 20:49 -0700
  Re: Detection of a specific sound alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2015-11-03 08:50 +0000
    Re: Detection of a specific sound Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-03 09:03 -0500
      Re: Detection of a specific sound alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2015-11-03 14:49 +0000
    Re: Detection of a specific sound Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2015-11-03 09:57 -0500

csiph-web