Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Random832 Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Detection of a specific sound Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 09:57:34 -0500 Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de heoEkN2wJHgN6kH9gV9kdgIrX/UJ3j8el98J+UjlNfpw== Cancel-Lock: sha1:rkVI6X3TKUwu9X5MVR1asC5H92Q= Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.056 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.90; '*S*': 0.02; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'sorts': 0.16; 'liability': 0.20; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'detector': 0.29; 'supposed': 0.31; 'received:comcast.net': 0.33; 'could': 0.35; 'there': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'fire': 0.63; 'risk': 0.68; 'wiring': 0.84; 'concluded': 0.91; 'dennis': 0.91; 'smoke': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-68-39-146-59.hsd1.in.comcast.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:98161 Dennis Lee Bieber writes: > If a fire did occur, and the inspectors find traces of wiring > going into what was supposed to be a stand-alone detector there is > a risk that it will be concluded that the detector had been > tampered with and may not have been functional... And that could > lead to all sorts of liability problems. What about a *second* smoke detector?