Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #105072
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: empty clause of for loops |
| Date | Thu, 17 Mar 2016 09:23:32 +0100 |
| Organization | None |
| Lines | 36 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.259.1458203026.12893.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | <56E93413.6090108@mail.de> <mailman.189.1458125264.12893.python-list@python.org> <E9dGy.48569$4l5.10304@fx37.am4> <ncbvig$8bl$1@ger.gmane.org> <20160316143934.5ca70b77@bigbox.christie.dr> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7Bit |
| X-Trace | news.uni-berlin.de GmED1aUozRtVySpsvWNlUgfizLNCT2VEG3J9olID12tQ== |
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.002 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'none:': 0.05; 'mentions': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; '-tkc': 0.16; 'item:': 0.16; 'iterable': 0.16; 'none]': 0.16; 'object()': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'sentinel': 0.16; 'sequence:': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'tim': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'chase': 0.29; 'that.': 0.30; "i'd": 0.31; 'problem': 0.33; 'something': 0.35; 'item': 0.35; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'stuff': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'received:de': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'further': 0.62; 'otten': 0.84; 'stronger': 0.84; 'wait,': 0.93 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | p57bd90e1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.13.3 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.21 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:105072 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Tim Chase wrote:
> On 2016-03-16 16:53, Peter Otten wrote:
>> > item=None
>> > for item in items:
>> > #do stuff
>> if item is None:
>> > #do something else
>>
>> I like that better now I see it.
>
> The only problem with that is if your iterable returns None as the
> last item:
I was aware of that. In practice I'd ensure the stronger "sentinel must not
occur in the iterable":
> items = ["Something here", None]
> item = None
> for item in items:
assert item is not None
> print(repr(item))
> if item is None:
> print("Empty iterable") # wait, no it's not!
>
> You'd have to use a sentinel like Ruud mentions further up-list:
>
> x = sentinal = object()
> for x in sequence:
> print(repr(x))
> if x is sentinal:
> print("Empty iterable")
>
> -tkc
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: empty clause of for loops Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-03-16 11:47 +0100
Re: empty clause of for loops alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-03-16 13:25 +0000
Re: empty clause of for loops Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-16 13:45 +0000
Re: empty clause of for loops alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-03-16 13:58 +0000
Re: empty clause of for loops "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de> - 2016-03-16 15:36 +0100
Re: empty clause of for loops Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-03-17 09:23 +0100
csiph-web