Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #31845

Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <gheskett@wdtv.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.053
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.90; '*S*': 0.00; 'true,': 0.04; 'width': 0.07; 'assembler': 0.09; 'high-level': 0.09; 'preserve': 0.09; 'spreading': 0.09; 'sat,': 0.15; 'buggy': 0.16; 'cli': 0.16; 'defaulting': 0.16; 'oct': 0.16; 'refactoring': 0.16; 'soap,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'code.': 0.20; 'do.': 0.21; 'orientation': 0.22; 'cheers,': 0.23; 'nearly': 0.23; "i've": 0.23; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'pages,': 0.27; 'displays': 0.27; 'fixed': 0.28; "d'aprano": 0.29; 'prints': 0.29; 'src': 0.29; 'steven': 0.29; 'character': 0.29; 'source': 0.29; 'probably': 0.29; "we're": 0.30; 'that.': 0.30; 'url:non-standard http port': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'gets': 0.32; "aren't": 0.33; 'defense': 0.33; 'up!': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; "can't": 0.34; 'doing': 0.35; 'table': 0.35; "won't": 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'characters': 0.36; 'limitation': 0.36; 'october': 0.37; 'does': 0.37; 'option': 0.37; 'drop': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'nothing': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'charset:windows-1256': 0.61; 'office': 0.61; 'back': 0.62; 'header:Message-Id:1': 0.62; 'preparation': 0.62; 'gone': 0.64; 'sunday': 0.65; 'listings': 0.66; 'received:204': 0.72; 'paper': 0.78; 'printers': 0.84; 'received:66.118': 0.84; 'dennis': 0.91; 'dozen': 0.91; 'edwards': 0.91; 'good,': 0.91; 'sheets': 0.91; 'drink': 0.93
X-Spam-Status No, score=-2.1 required=5.0
X-Spam-Level
From Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com>
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness
Date Sun, 21 Oct 2012 07:08:43 -0400
References <mailman.2501.1350638446.27098.python-list@python.org> <k5ubs7$p6b$1@reader1.panix.com> <5083ad3e$0$29978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
In-Reply-To <5083ad3e$0$29978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type Text/Plain; charset="windows-1256"
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2585.1350817736.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 43
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1350817736 news.xs4all.nl 6871 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60077
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:31845

Show key headers only | View raw

On Sunday 21 October 2012 07:02:26 Steven D'Aprano did opine:

> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 14:18:47 +0000, Grant Edwards wrote:
> > On 2012-10-20, Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> 	Strangely, we've gone from 80-character fixed width displays to
> >> 
> >> who-knows-what (if I drop my font size I can probably get nearly 200
> >> characters across in full-screen mode)...
> >> 
> >> 	But at the same time we've gone from 132-character line-printers
> >> 
> >> using fan-fold 11x17 pages, to office inkjet/laser printers using
> >> 8.5x11 paper, defaulting to portrait orientation -- with a 10
> >> character/inch font, and 1/4" left/right margins, we're back to 80
> >> character limitation
> >>
> >><G>
> >>
> > True, but nobody prints source code out on paper do they?
> 
> I do.
> 
> There's nothing better than spreading out a dozen sheets of source code
> over a table to get a good, high-level overview of what does what in
> preparation to refactoring it.
> 
> > Seriously -- I can't remember the last time I printed souce code...
> 
> I've never printed souce code either *wink*

So do I, but I often am looking at assembler listings with the assembler 
set for 132 chars a line to preserve the src codes comments, so lp gets a 
use 17 cpi option on the cli that makes the listing.  I probably recycle 2 
reams of paper a year doing exactly that.  Those who won't take advantage 
of that are doomed to publish buggy code.

Cheers, Gene
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
My web page: <http://coyoteden.dyndns-free.com:85/gene> is up!
Not all men who drink are poets.  Some of us drink because we aren't poets.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> - 2012-10-19 11:21 +0200
  Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-19 22:14 +0000
    Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-10-19 20:23 -0400
      Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-20 14:18 +0000
        Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-10-20 15:10 -0400
        Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Walter Hurry <walterhurry@lavabit.com> - 2012-10-20 20:02 +0000
        Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness David Robinow <drobinow@gmail.com> - 2012-10-20 16:02 -0400
        Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-21 08:07 +0000
          Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-21 20:20 +1100
            Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-21 10:00 +0000
              Re: printing (was: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness) Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-10-21 06:03 -0500
              Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-21 22:43 +1100
                Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-21 19:11 +0000
                Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-21 19:23 +0000
                Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-10-21 16:19 -0400
                Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-22 07:38 +1100
                Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-22 07:22 +1100
                Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-22 06:30 +0000
                Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-22 18:03 +1100
                Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-10-22 08:29 -0400
                RE: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-10-22 20:48 +0000
                Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-22 16:02 -0600
                Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-10-22 21:39 -0400
                Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2012-10-23 08:35 +0100
                Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-23 10:50 -0600
                Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-23 22:34 +0000
                Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-23 17:24 -0600
                Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-24 00:04 +0000
          Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2012-10-21 07:08 -0400
          Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-10-21 12:42 -0400
        Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness DJC <djc@news.invalid> - 2012-10-21 15:06 +0100
    Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-10-19 22:27 -0500
      Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-10-20 00:35 -0700
    Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-10-20 16:37 -0400
      Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Walter Hurry <walterhurry@lavabit.com> - 2012-10-21 21:58 +0000

csiph-web