Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #46666

Re: Future standard GUI library

Path csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.055
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.89; '*S*': 0.00; 'mouse': 0.07; 'cursor': 0.09; 'git': 0.09; 'http': 0.09; 'proficient': 0.09; 'statistical': 0.09; "they've": 0.09; 'to)': 0.09; 'gui': 0.12; 'project,': 0.12; 'stored': 0.12; '"web': 0.16; 'anomalies,': 0.16; 'former,': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'git.': 0.16; 'latter,': 0.16; 'programmers.': 0.16; 'rarely': 0.16; 'right-click': 0.16; 'ssh': 0.16; 'subject:GUI': 0.16; 'subject:library': 0.16; 'time"': 0.16; 'written.': 0.16; 'exception': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'obviously': 0.18; 'result.': 0.19; 'not,': 0.20; 'programming': 0.22; 'separate': 0.22; 'keyboard': 0.24; 'looks': 0.24; '(or': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'installed': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'absolute': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; '(unless': 0.31; 'app.': 0.31; 'correctly.': 0.31; 'gcc': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'stuff': 0.32; 'supposed': 0.32; 'themselves': 0.32; 'quite': 0.32; 'computer.': 0.33; 'entirely': 0.33; 'programmers': 0.33; 'actual': 0.34; "can't": 0.35; 'agree': 0.35; 'one,': 0.35; 'requirement': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'add': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'animation': 0.36; 'installing': 0.36; 'much.': 0.36; 'doing': 0.36; "didn't": 0.36; 'similar': 0.36; 'application': 0.37; 'list': 0.37; 'step': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'remote': 0.38; 'skip:o 20': 0.38; 'server': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'little': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'mailing': 0.39; 'either': 0.39; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'full': 0.61; 'browser': 0.61; 'entire': 0.61; 'course': 0.61; 'times': 0.62; "you'll": 0.62; 'refer': 0.63; 'choose': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'taking': 0.65; 'earn': 0.67; 'beat': 0.68; 'internet': 0.71; 'productivity': 0.74; 'day': 0.76; 'power': 0.76; 'url:jpg': 0.83; 'url:images': 0.83; 'low': 0.83; 'alone,': 0.84; 'devices,': 0.84; 'everything.': 0.84; 'have?': 0.84; 'hopeless': 0.84; 'lan.': 0.84; 'partial': 0.84; 'absolutely': 0.87; 'demand': 0.91; 'system:': 0.91; 'wait,': 0.93; 'instant': 0.97; '2013': 0.98
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=m+BCG+5bDH9aImlZ1DO5rWZPFhwHNjR4o1xT54Djq64=; b=q/mPyCDi5sP5WZAir+JZpR74oSHLTNESDtpzTiPDQyGnGrrUOrEbC4MUUL8V+Sdxnp anHOCGrT6FLGUkdChe5YuToY28iD2yRfTPJzetq4Pn0GQY42+VRyC7eXvV46fNPDxJky ja8CoP2KkIcv5qDzbcAwqRh2wAhREmDi1XK49I3PBPIdg5laGab/tL0RQBukMdEa10NM ebCZoM44VQQ3myJdVIPuog3AHLgvOng5KRxeO3XAPoZ4otb3rkIglItLdX1uxQW5D4/c E9/xjKtZIrWGr2Jt3KB79IoxVlO2t2c0d+HKh+FDvtsOenfA2sMV3FZPHF9nFBqncp9l Ly1Q==
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Received by 10.58.116.229 with SMTP id jz5mr15016043veb.14.1370119563118; Sat, 01 Jun 2013 13:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <20130601201817.55d3361dda93dac387a9eab6@gmx.net>
References <mailman.1803.1368885785.3114.python-list@python.org> <20130522154233.fe5263cb231c375fc60c7c9b@gmx.net> <mailman.1967.1369232658.3114.python-list@python.org> <20130523174145.22a6c46f586b0a1f656d2412@gmx.net> <mailman.2020.1369324735.3114.python-list@python.org> <20130526194310.9cdb1be80b42c7fdf0ba502f@gmx.net> <mailman.2193.1369597318.3114.python-list@python.org> <20130527172250.a8b0ce44f29398d63a4ec650@gmx.net> <mailman.2258.1369674988.3114.python-list@python.org> <20130530184045.6d15530be70e18d96e5654ad@gmx.net> <mailman.2430.1369932803.3114.python-list@python.org> <20130601201817.55d3361dda93dac387a9eab6@gmx.net>
Date Sun, 2 Jun 2013 06:46:02 +1000
Subject Re: Future standard GUI library
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
To python-list@python.org
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2529.1370119566.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 73
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1370119566 news.xs4all.nl 15887 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:52861
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:46666

Show key headers only | View raw


On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net> wrote:
>> > A GUI that can not be used without taking the ten fingers off the
>> > keyboard is indeed entirely unusable for any half-proficient
>> > screenworker. And anyone doing actual productive screenwork every
>> > day for more than just a few months will inevitably (have to) get
>> > proficient (unless completely braindead).
>>
>> My ten fingers stay on my keyboard, which looks somewhat thus:
>>
>> http://www.xbitlabs.com/images/mobile/lenovo-thinkpad-t61/keyboard.jpg
>>
>> See the red dot in the middle? Mouse.
>
> I didn't mean "trackpoints" or similar devices, but full keyboard
> "navigation" of the entire GUI through shortcuts etc.
>
> A "touch-type" GUI is a "must have" for any application that's supposed
> to be used productively. The mouse is nice to "explore" a GUI or for
> occasional/leisurely use, but once you use an application daily to earn
> your living, it's a hopeless roadblock for productivity.

You have seriously underestimated the power of the combined
keyboard+mouse interface. I absolutely agree that keyboard-only will
(almost) always beat mouse-only, but keyboard AND mouse together can
beat either alone, if the UI is designed correctly.

Case in point: Partial staging of a file in git. I can use 'git add
-p' or 'git gui'. With the former, it's all keyboard; I can step
through the hunks, choose what to stage, move on. With the latter,
it's more visual; I right-click a hunk and choose "Stage this hunk"
(or "Stage this line", which is actually quite fiddly with 'git add
-p').

I am a self-confessed keyboard junkie. I will use the keyboard for
pretty much everything. Yet I use git gui and almost never git add -p,
the one exception being when I can't use git gui (eg it's not
installed on some remote headless system and installing it would
require fetching gobs of GUI libraries). It uses the mouse to good
result.

> As is the "response time" behaviour of "web applications".

On a LAN, with a proper back-end, I can get instant response from a
web app. Obviously over the internet there's latency, but that's
nothing to do with the use of a web browser as a UI; you'll see that
with ssh just as much.

> "No cursor animation ever" is an absolute "must have" requirement for
> productivity applications.

Not really. There are times when the human will be legitimately
waiting for the computer. http://xkcd.com/303/ for one. But this still
has little to do with the use of a web browser UI; I can achieve
exactly that with the Yosemite Project, which can actually be a
three-computer system: the content is stored on one, the HTTP server
is on another, and the web browser is separate again. And this is only
a 100Mbit LAN. If you need moar speeeeeeed, you can always demand
gigabit or better.

>> THIS is a professional programmer's workspace. :)
>
> And by "screenworkers" I didn't refer to programmers. Those people
> rarely have to use the stuff that they implement.

Of course not, programmers never use software they've themselves
written. Never. Not in a million... oh wait, what's this I have? Hmm,
gcc used to compile gcc, RosMud being used by Rosuav, Neil Hodgson
using SciTE... naw, they're all statistical anomalies, carry on!

You really have a very low opinion of programmers for someone on a
programming mailing list :)

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Future standard GUI library Beinan Li <li.beinan@gmail.com> - 2013-05-18 10:03 -0400
  Re: Future standard GUI library Kevin Walzer <kw@codebykevin.com> - 2013-05-18 11:32 -0400
  Re: Future standard GUI library Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-18 21:25 +0000
  Re: Future standard GUI library llanitedave <llanitedave@veawb.coop> - 2013-05-18 20:01 -0700
    Re: Future standard GUI library Kevin Walzer <kw@codebykevin.com> - 2013-05-19 08:57 -0400
  Re: Future standard GUI library Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net> - 2013-05-22 15:42 +0200
    Re: Future standard GUI library Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-23 00:24 +1000
      Re: Future standard GUI library llanitedave <llanitedave@veawb.coop> - 2013-05-22 19:31 -0700
        Re: Future standard GUI library Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-05-23 07:43 +0100
        Re: Future standard GUI library Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-23 16:48 +1000
        RE: Future standard GUI library Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-05-23 09:58 +0300
        Re: Future standard GUI library Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-23 17:03 +1000
        RE: Future standard GUI library Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-05-23 08:08 +0100
      Re: Future standard GUI library Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net> - 2013-05-23 17:41 +0200
        Re: Future standard GUI library Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-24 01:51 +1000
          Re: Future standard GUI library Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net> - 2013-05-26 19:43 +0200
            Re: Future standard GUI library Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-05-26 14:16 -0400
              Re: Future standard GUI library Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net> - 2013-05-27 17:31 +0200
                Re: Future standard GUI library Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-05-27 11:13 -0600
                Re: Future standard GUI library Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-28 08:21 +1000
                Re: Future standard GUI library Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-05-27 19:10 -0400
                Re: Future standard GUI library Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-28 17:11 +1000
                Re: Future standard GUI library 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@gmail.com> - 2013-05-28 02:40 -0700
                Re: Future standard GUI library Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-05-28 01:01 +0000
            RE: Future standard GUI library Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-05-26 21:32 +0300
              Re: Future standard GUI library Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net> - 2013-05-28 19:26 +0200
                Re: Future standard GUI library Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-05-28 12:16 -0600
                RE: Future standard GUI library Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-05-29 00:17 +0300
                Re: Future standard GUI library Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-29 17:20 +1000
            Re: Future standard GUI library Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-27 04:56 +1000
            Re: Future standard GUI library Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-05-26 13:41 -0600
              Re: Future standard GUI library Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-05-26 15:45 -0400
                Re: Future standard GUI library Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-05-26 15:13 -0600
                Re: Future standard GUI library Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-05-28 15:40 +0000
              Re: Future standard GUI library Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net> - 2013-05-27 17:22 +0200
                Re: Future standard GUI library Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-05-27 11:16 -0600
                Re: Future standard GUI library Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net> - 2013-05-30 18:40 +0200
                Re: Future standard GUI library Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-31 02:53 +1000
                Re: Future standard GUI library Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-02 06:46 +1000
                Re: Future standard GUI library Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net> - 2013-06-01 20:18 +0200
                Re: Future standard GUI library Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-06-01 17:52 -0400
            Re: Future standard GUI library Ian Foote <ian@feete.org> - 2013-05-26 22:02 +0100
            Re: Future standard GUI library Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-27 08:09 +1000
        Re: Future standard GUI library Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-05-23 20:37 +0000
          Re: Future standard GUI library Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net> - 2013-05-28 19:28 +0200
            Re: Future standard GUI library Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-05-28 18:25 +0000
              Re: Future standard GUI library 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@gmail.com> - 2013-05-28 16:19 -0700

csiph-web