Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #25945

Re: Gender, Representativeness and Reputation in StackOverflow

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <jeanpierreda@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.018
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; '(at': 0.03; 'encouraging': 0.07; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'value.': 0.15; 'better?': 0.16; 'least,': 0.16; 'make,': 0.16; 'to:addr:pearwood.info': 0.16; 'to:addr:steve+comp.lang.python': 0.16; "to:name:steven d'aprano": 0.16; 'mon,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'donated': 0.17; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'authors': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; "d'aprano": 0.29; 'received:209.85.213.174': 0.29; 'received:mail- yx0-f174.google.com': 0.29; 'steven': 0.29; 'related': 0.30; 'point': 0.31; 'aside': 0.32; 'could': 0.32; 'knowledge': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'so,': 0.35; 'doing': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'scientific': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'too': 0.36; 'why': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'data': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'valuable': 0.60; 'subject:, ': 0.61; 'free': 0.61; 'leaving': 0.62; 'jul': 0.65; 'attention': 0.75; 'papers': 0.78; 'judgement': 0.84; 'subject:skip:S 10': 0.84; 'terrible': 0.84
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=0jynSJ7PE9LFuROBT95UxYlbnFHE2b3sMqfeOuwO01c=; b=DL+8vqSEPIrXxG6sFp+OZ6ZKKM14dJC3xDYy9seVhwwDpqfnuvi4p0hcdUbCw/Enlu 4xtVOL8cIedkRlTd55rhQF7W8gsxbhWnvu6s0Iom62eDBihtCxoSdohPtQe8a3xjoTvY P/pw9qHBvVf6o8xwxzFq5u147HsIH5raQxtbUB+vL5PYzQut6qz6TwH6yo0CXLYFMJ04 ev8lgmga89PqGQaiKIpW4pV+R4DFeBHVTDkb74LheyTRRj0w9BIN4uXBvoeiQE/Ye30U LMxvSY5X9KrpnKHRFA5wUPBtOCfkr46gbtj/cH4XYnYCoAjp4ra7R5gT0gNqpUhi86P8 nsSg==
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <500dfaba$0$29978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
References <30cde2cd-ee38-4b54-87cc-5c0a79e9f1c6@googlegroups.com> <mailman.2504.1343079901.4697.python-list@python.org> <500dfaba$0$29978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
From Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com>
Date Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:51:07 -0400
Subject Re: Gender, Representativeness and Reputation in StackOverflow
To "Steven D'Aprano" <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2514.1343098310.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 23
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1343098310 news.xs4all.nl 6847 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44980
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:25945

Show key headers only | View raw


On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Steven D'Aprano
<steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote:
>> Leaving aside the point that this is not directly related to Python, my
>> opinion is that if the authors will not make past and future papers
>> freely available, not even an abstract, they should not ask for valuable
>> free data from freely donated time.
>
> Well of course it is your time and your judgement to make, but in my
> opinion even non-free scientific knowledge is better than ignorance.

When people boycott a product, it isn't because not having the product
is better than having the product. That's clearly untrue: despite the
reasons for the boycott, the product has some value. They boycott it
because by doing so, they can get something better than <product with
badness> or <nothing> -- they can get <product without badness>. (At
least, in theory :)

Why settle for a terrible situation, when we could be encouraging
people to do better?

/me has been paying too much attention to the Elsevier boycott

-- Devin

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Gender, Representativeness and Reputation in StackOverflow Alexander Serebrenik <A.Serebrenik@tue.nl> - 2012-07-23 05:51 -0700
  Re: Gender, Representativeness and Reputation in StackOverflow Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-07-23 17:44 -0400
    Re: Gender, Representativeness and Reputation in StackOverflow Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-24 01:30 +0000
      Re: Gender, Representativeness and Reputation in StackOverflow Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2012-07-23 22:51 -0400
        Freedom and Data (was Gender, Representativeness and Reputation in StackOverflow) rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-07-23 20:56 -0700
          Re: Freedom and Data (was Gender, Representativeness and Reputation in StackOverflow) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-24 14:28 +1000
            Re: Freedom and Data (was Gender, Representativeness and Reputation in StackOverflow) rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-07-23 22:26 -0700
        Re: Gender, Representativeness and Reputation in StackOverflow Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-24 05:34 +0000
          Re: Gender, Representativeness and Reputation in StackOverflow rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-07-23 22:56 -0700
            Re: Gender, Representativeness and Reputation in StackOverflow Alexander Serebrenik <A.Serebrenik@tue.nl> - 2012-07-24 00:26 -0700
            Re: Gender, Representativeness and Reputation in StackOverflow Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-24 08:33 +0000
      Re: Gender, Representativeness and Reputation in StackOverflow Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-24 14:19 +1000
  Re: Re: Gender, Representativeness and Reputation in StackOverflow Evan Driscoll <driscoll@cs.wisc.edu> - 2012-07-23 17:01 -0500
  Re: Gender, Representativeness and Reputation in StackOverflow Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2012-07-23 15:09 -0700
    Re: Gender, Representativeness and Reputation in StackOverflow Alexander Serebrenik <A.Serebrenik@tue.nl> - 2012-07-23 15:14 -0700
      Re: Gender, Representativeness and Reputation in StackOverflow Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2012-07-23 20:01 -0400
    Re: Gender, Representativeness and Reputation in StackOverflow Alexander Serebrenik <A.Serebrenik@tue.nl> - 2012-07-23 15:14 -0700
  Re: Gender, Representativeness and Reputation in StackOverflow Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-07-23 18:14 -0400

csiph-web