Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #31698
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.002 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'lines,': 0.05; 'lines.': 0.07; 'width': 0.07; 'finite': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'sections': 0.13; 'code).': 0.16; 'columns': 0.16; 'distinct': 0.16; 'exponential': 0.16; 'finney': 0.16; 'merge,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'three-way': 0.16; 'char': 0.17; 'example.': 0.17; 'obviously': 0.18; 'windows': 0.19; 'code.': 0.20; 'regardless': 0.21; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; "doesn't": 0.28; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'lines': 0.28; 'writes:': 0.29; 'code': 0.31; '(and': 0.32; 'room': 0.32; 'print': 0.32; 'shorter': 0.33; 'strict': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'another': 0.33; 'ben': 0.35; "won't": 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'compare': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'too': 0.36; 'enough': 0.36; 'does': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'mean': 0.38; 'several': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'kind': 0.61; 'world': 0.63; 'more': 0.63; 'our': 0.65; 'limit': 0.65; 'exceed': 0.65; 'printers': 0.84; 'reducing': 0.95 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> |
| Subject | Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness |
| Date | Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:39:41 +1100 |
| References | <k5ovel$3t8$1@reader1.panix.com> <153569467.1651735.1350568758155.JavaMail.root@sequans.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | rasputin.madmonks.org |
| X-Public-Key-ID | 0xBD41714B |
| X-Public-Key-Fingerprint | 9CFE 12B0 791A 4267 887F 520C B7AC 2E51 BD41 714B |
| X-Public-Key-URL | http://www.benfinney.id.au/contact/bfinney-gpg.asc |
| X-Post-From | Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au> |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:+M5CkLAoZLXgbbLZpqb9PJ2SNqM= |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2485.1350607199.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 25 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1350607199 news.xs4all.nl 6881 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60028 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:31698 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> writes: > The 79 char limit purpose is to allow someone to read the code on a 80 > char terminal (and allow old printers to print the code). There is a very good reason for a strict line width limit regardless of terminal size: scanning long lines is cognitively more difficult than scanning shorter lines. This doesn't mean we should keep reducing the length of our lines, of course; obviously there needs to be enough room on a line to be expressive. But it does mean that lines which are too long are not kind to the reader. Another good reason: Even if you have a large terminal, you will often need to compare distinct sections of code. Knowing that code won't exceed 80 columns means that you can lay several windows of code side-by-side, for a three-way merge, for example. -- \ “Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a | `\ finite world is either a madman or an economist.” —Kenneth | _o__) Boulding | Ben Finney
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Zero Piraeus <schesis@gmail.com> - 2012-10-18 02:06 -0400
Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-18 06:31 +0000
Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Hans Mulder <hansmu@xs4all.nl> - 2012-10-18 11:07 +0200
Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2012-10-18 02:33 -0700
Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-10-18 06:05 -0500
Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-18 21:01 +1100
RE: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-10-18 18:42 +0000
Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-10-19 11:33 +1100
Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-10-18 20:35 -0700
Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-19 04:08 +0000
Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Zero Piraeus <schesis@gmail.com> - 2012-10-18 06:31 -0400
Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-10-17 23:55 -0700
Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-17 23:56 -0700
Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-18 13:16 +0000
Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-10-19 11:39 +1100
Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Den <patentsvnc@gmail.com> - 2012-10-18 08:55 -0700
Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2012-10-18 16:13 +0000
Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-19 03:21 +1100
RE: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-10-18 18:51 +0000
RE: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-10-18 18:50 +0000
Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Zero Piraeus <schesis@gmail.com> - 2012-10-18 17:36 -0400
Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-19 01:50 +0000
Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Den <patentsvnc@gmail.com> - 2012-10-18 08:55 -0700
Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-18 17:44 +0000
Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2012-10-18 18:53 -0400
Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Krzysztof Voss <shobbo@gmail.com> - 2012-10-19 15:16 -0700
Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Krzysztof Voss <shobbo@gmail.com> - 2012-10-19 15:16 -0700
csiph-web