Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #31616

Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness

Show all headers | View raw

Le jeudi 18 octobre 2012 11:07:25 UTC+2, Hans Mulder a écrit :
> On 18/10/12 08:31:51, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 02:06:19 -0400, Zero Piraeus wrote:
> 
> >> 3. Say "well, at least it's not a backslash" and break the line using
> 
> >> > parentheses.
> 
> > I mostly do this. Since most lines include a bracket of some sort, I 
> 
> > rarely need to add outer parentheses just for the purpose of line 
> 
> > continuation.
> 
> > 
> 
> > some_variable = spam('x') + ham(
> 
> >                     some_longer_variables, here_and_here, 
> 
> >                     and_here_also)
> 
> 
> 
> I would spell that as:
> 
> 
> 
> some_variable = spam('x') + ham(
> 
>     some_longer_variables,
> 
>     here_and_here,
> 
>     and_here_also,
> 
> )
> 
> 
> 
> > I know PEP 8 says I should drop the final round bracket to the next line, 
> 
> > but I don't normally like that.
> 
> 
> 
> I normally put the final bracket on the next line, where it is
> 
> very visible.  Compare:
> 
> 
> 
> if looks_like_it_might_be_spam(
> 
>     some_longer_variables,
> 
>     here_and_here, and_here_also):
> 
>     logger.notice("might be spam")
> 
>     move_to_spam_folder(some_longer_variables)
> 
>     update_spam_statistics(here_and_here)
> 
> 
> 
> vs.
> 
> 
> 
> if looks_like_it_might_be_spam(
> 
>     some_longer_variables,
> 
>     here_and_here,
> 
>     and_here_also,
> 
> ):
> 
>     logger.notice("might be spam")
> 
>     move_to_spam_folder(some_longer_variables)
> 
>     update_spam_statistics(here_and_here)
> 
> 
> 
> Which one would you say is more readable?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- HansM

I use a "double indentation".

>>> if 'asdf' and 'asdf' and 'asdf' \
...         'asdf' and 'asdf' and \
...         'asdf' and 'asdf':
...     print('do if')
...     s = 'asdf'
...     ss = 'asdf'
...     
do if
>>> if looks_like_it_might_be_spam(
...         some_longer_variables,
...         here_and_here, and_here_also):
...     logger.notice("might be spam")
...     move_to_spam_folder(some_longer_variables)
...     update_spam_statistics(here_and_here)
...     
Traceback (most recent call last):

jmf

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Zero Piraeus <schesis@gmail.com> - 2012-10-18 02:06 -0400
  Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-18 06:31 +0000
    Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Hans Mulder <hansmu@xs4all.nl> - 2012-10-18 11:07 +0200
      Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2012-10-18 02:33 -0700
        Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-10-18 06:05 -0500
      Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-18 21:01 +1100
      RE: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-10-18 18:42 +0000
      Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-10-19 11:33 +1100
        Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-10-18 20:35 -0700
          Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-19 04:08 +0000
    Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Zero Piraeus <schesis@gmail.com> - 2012-10-18 06:31 -0400
  Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-10-17 23:55 -0700
  Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-17 23:56 -0700
  Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-18 13:16 +0000
    Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-10-19 11:39 +1100
  Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Den <patentsvnc@gmail.com> - 2012-10-18 08:55 -0700
    Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2012-10-18 16:13 +0000
      Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-19 03:21 +1100
      RE: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-10-18 18:51 +0000
    RE: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmorgan.com> - 2012-10-18 18:50 +0000
    Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Zero Piraeus <schesis@gmail.com> - 2012-10-18 17:36 -0400
      Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-19 01:50 +0000
  Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Den <patentsvnc@gmail.com> - 2012-10-18 08:55 -0700
    Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-18 17:44 +0000
      Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2012-10-18 18:53 -0400
  Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Krzysztof Voss <shobbo@gmail.com> - 2012-10-19 15:16 -0700
  Re: A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness Krzysztof Voss <shobbo@gmail.com> - 2012-10-19 15:16 -0700

csiph-web