Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #59194
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!uio.no!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.005 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; "subject:' ": 0.07; 'immutable': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'try:': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'def': 0.12; 'choose,': 0.16; 'comparison.': 0.16; 'hashable': 0.16; 'hashable,': 0.16; 'immutable,': 0.16; 'kern': 0.16; 'mutability': 0.16; 'mutable': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'sake,': 0.16; 'tuple': 0.16; 'typeerror:': 0.16; 'underlying': 0.16; 'unhashable': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'tests': 0.22; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'interpret': 0.24; 'header:X-Complaints- To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'chris': 0.29; "doesn't": 0.30; 'robert': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'agreed.': 0.31; 'comparison': 0.31; "d'aprano": 0.31; 'default,': 0.31; 'equality': 0.31; 'steven': 0.31; 'this.': 0.32; 'quite': 0.32; 'agree': 0.35; 'classes': 0.35; 'except': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'objects': 0.35; 'test': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'false': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'example,': 0.37; 'nov': 0.38; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'itself': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'affect': 0.61; 'new': 0.61; 'our': 0.64; 'afraid': 0.65; 'world': 0.66; 'due': 0.66; 'believe': 0.68; 'subject': 0.69; 'default': 0.69; 'different.': 0.84; 'eco': 0.84; 'terrible': 0.84; 'reasons,': 0.91; '2013': 0.98 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: 'isimmutable' and 'ImmutableNester' |
| Date | Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:00:07 +0000 |
| References | <CAB6+5b_w+kBT=EDqd9wRO80am+Wp2DgrEqSpVEPWkcTAVmYQtQ@mail.gmail.com> <1384206048.30461.46091021.634F0FCA@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAB6+5b-KZE1xWqyefFicRkk4xhr9aqSWvaOhvgHJGf0s4RpexQ@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.2431.1384240366.18130.python-list@python.org> <52820da6$0$30003$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | 213.1.240.226 |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <52820da6$0$30003$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2462.1384264821.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 45 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1384264822 news.xs4all.nl 15994 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37921 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:59194 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2013-11-12 11:14, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 18:12:43 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote: > >> def isimmutable(x): >> try: >> hash(x) >> return True >> except TypeError: >> return False > > I'm afraid that doesn't test for immutability. It tests for hashability, > which is different. I am going to nitpick below for nitpicking's sake, but I agree with this. > No well-behaved mutable object can be hashable, but that's not to say > that badly-behaved mutable objects won't be hashable. That's not quite true. A well-behaved mutable may be (well-behaved) hashable as long as the allowed mutations do not affect the equality comparison. For example, in Python 2, all new classes are mutable by default, but they are also well-behaved hashable by default because their equality comparison is identity comparison. None of the mutations affect object identity, so the hash based on identity remains well-behaved. > And every immutable > object should be hashable, but that's not to say that some immutable > objects might choose, for their own reasons, not to be hashable. I would also dispute this. A tuple itself is immutable, but it may not be hashable because one of its contained objects is unhashable (whether due to mutability or something else). > So your function is subject to both false negatives and false positives. Agreed. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: 'isimmutable' and 'ImmutableNester' Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-12 18:12 +1100
Re: 'isimmutable' and 'ImmutableNester' Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-11-12 11:14 +0000
Re: 'isimmutable' and 'ImmutableNester' Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2013-11-12 14:00 +0000
csiph-web