Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #59194

Re: 'isimmutable' and 'ImmutableNester'

From Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 'isimmutable' and 'ImmutableNester'
Date 2013-11-12 14:00 +0000
References <CAB6+5b_w+kBT=EDqd9wRO80am+Wp2DgrEqSpVEPWkcTAVmYQtQ@mail.gmail.com> <1384206048.30461.46091021.634F0FCA@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAB6+5b-KZE1xWqyefFicRkk4xhr9aqSWvaOhvgHJGf0s4RpexQ@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.2431.1384240366.18130.python-list@python.org> <52820da6$0$30003$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2462.1384264821.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 2013-11-12 11:14, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 18:12:43 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> def isimmutable(x):
>>      try:
>>          hash(x)
>>          return True
>>      except TypeError:
>>          return False
>
> I'm afraid that doesn't test for immutability. It tests for hashability,
> which is different.

I am going to nitpick below for nitpicking's sake, but I agree with this.

> No well-behaved mutable object can be hashable, but that's not to say
> that badly-behaved mutable objects won't be hashable.

That's not quite true. A well-behaved mutable may be (well-behaved) hashable as 
long as the allowed mutations do not affect the equality comparison. For 
example, in Python 2, all new classes are mutable by default, but they are also 
well-behaved hashable by default because their equality comparison is identity 
comparison. None of the mutations affect object identity, so the hash based on 
identity remains well-behaved.

> And every immutable
> object should be hashable, but that's not to say that some immutable
> objects might choose, for their own reasons, not to be hashable.

I would also dispute this. A tuple itself is immutable, but it may not be 
hashable because one of its contained objects is unhashable (whether due to 
mutability or something else).

> So your function is subject to both false negatives and false positives.

Agreed.

-- 
Robert Kern

"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
  that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
  an underlying truth."
   -- Umberto Eco

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: 'isimmutable' and 'ImmutableNester' Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-12 18:12 +1100
  Re: 'isimmutable' and 'ImmutableNester' Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-11-12 11:14 +0000
    Re: 'isimmutable' and 'ImmutableNester' Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2013-11-12 14:00 +0000

csiph-web