Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #42519
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!newsfeed.eweka.nl!eweka.nl!feeder3.eweka.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <madeleine.udell@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.008 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'jesse': 0.05; '*not*': 0.07; 'noller': 0.07; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.11; 'thread': 0.14; '(which,': 0.16; 'cc:name:python list': 0.16; 'inaccessible': 0.16; 'logical,': 0.16; 'resolved?': 0.16; 'tracker,': 0.16; 'sat,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'all,': 0.19; 'bit': 0.19; 'module': 0.19; 'appears': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'cc:2**1': 0.23; 'creating': 0.23; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'adds': 0.24; 'module,': 0.24; 'holds': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'correct': 0.29; '2009': 0.29; 'patch': 0.29; 'submitting': 0.31; 'ordinary': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'this.': 0.32; 'option': 0.32; 'quite': 0.32; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'received:209.85.220': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'received:209': 0.37; 'manager': 0.38; 'issue': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'moving': 0.39; 'from:no real name:2**0': 0.61; 'different': 0.65; 'between': 0.67; 'subject:Get': 0.68; '6:11': 0.84; 'safe.': 0.84; 'received:209.85.220.184': 0.91; 'wishing': 0.93; 'enhancement': 0.95 |
| X-Received | by 10.50.153.101 with SMTP id vf5mr984628igb.3.1364855744392; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 15:35:44 -0700 (PDT) |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Date | Mon, 1 Apr 2013 15:35:44 -0700 (PDT) |
| In-Reply-To | <mailman.5376.1241962506.11746.python-list@python.org> |
| Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| Injection-Info | glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=171.64.92.59; posting-account=H9EcpQoAAACKwG86xOMuaLgcg87Je64O |
| References | <4a05b27a_2@news.arcor-ip.de> <4a05b6c6_2@news.arcor-ip.de> <28KdnTocUpw2X5jXnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@pdx.net> <529683651263584828.031438address_is-invalid.invalid@news.arcor.de> <-vKdnex07oQzQpjXnZ2dnUVZ_hZi4p2d@pdx.net> <4a05ff89_1@news.arcor-ip.de> <mailman.5376.1241962506.11746.python-list@python.org> |
| User-Agent | G2/1.0 |
| X-Google-Web-Client | true |
| X-Google-IP | 171.64.92.59 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Subject | Re: Get multiprocessing.Queue to do priorities |
| From | madeleine.udell@gmail.com |
| To | comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Cc | Python List <python-list@python.org>, uuid <M8R-gqmgb4@mailinator.com> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Message-ID | <mailman.24.1364856317.17481.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 20 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1364856317 news.xs4all.nl 6945 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:36584 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:42519 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Was this issue ever resolved? What is the current best practice for those wishing to use a priority queue with multiprocessing? On Sunday, May 10, 2009 6:35:03 AM UTC-7, Jesse Noller wrote: > On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 6:11 PM, uuid <M8R-gqmgb4@mailinator.com> wrote: > > The Queue module, apparently, is thread safe, but *not* process safe. If you > > try to use an ordinary Queue, it appears inaccessible to the worker process. > > (Which, after all, is quite logical, since methods for moving items between > > the threads of the same process are quite different from inter-process > > communication.) It appears that creating a manager that holds a shared queue > > might be an option > > (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/342556/python-2-6-multiprocessing-queue-compatible-with-threads). > > Using a manager, or submitting a patch which adds priority queue to > the multiprocessing.queue module is the correct solution for this. > > You can file an enhancement in the tracker, and assign/add me to it, > but without a patch it may take me a bit (wicked busy right now). > > jesse
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Get multiprocessing.Queue to do priorities madeleine.udell@gmail.com - 2013-04-01 15:35 -0700
csiph-web