Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #42519
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-01 15:35 -0700 |
| References | (2 earlier) <28KdnTocUpw2X5jXnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@pdx.net> <529683651263584828.031438address_is-invalid.invalid@news.arcor.de> <-vKdnex07oQzQpjXnZ2dnUVZ_hZi4p2d@pdx.net> <4a05ff89_1@news.arcor-ip.de> <mailman.5376.1241962506.11746.python-list@python.org> |
| Subject | Re: Get multiprocessing.Queue to do priorities |
| From | madeleine.udell@gmail.com |
| Message-ID | <mailman.24.1364856317.17481.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Was this issue ever resolved? What is the current best practice for those wishing to use a priority queue with multiprocessing? On Sunday, May 10, 2009 6:35:03 AM UTC-7, Jesse Noller wrote: > On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 6:11 PM, uuid <M8R-gqmgb4@mailinator.com> wrote: > > The Queue module, apparently, is thread safe, but *not* process safe. If you > > try to use an ordinary Queue, it appears inaccessible to the worker process. > > (Which, after all, is quite logical, since methods for moving items between > > the threads of the same process are quite different from inter-process > > communication.) It appears that creating a manager that holds a shared queue > > might be an option > > (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/342556/python-2-6-multiprocessing-queue-compatible-with-threads). > > Using a manager, or submitting a patch which adds priority queue to > the multiprocessing.queue module is the correct solution for this. > > You can file an enhancement in the tracker, and assign/add me to it, > but without a patch it may take me a bit (wicked busy right now). > > jesse
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Get multiprocessing.Queue to do priorities madeleine.udell@gmail.com - 2013-04-01 15:35 -0700
csiph-web