Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #59058
| References | <mailman.2313.1384037901.18130.python-list@python.org> <70dcaa80-7502-4312-9d8b-652afdaaf0fb@googlegroups.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-11 20:55 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Languages for different purposes (was Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python) |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2365.1384163739.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 8:28 PM, <wxjmfauth@gmail.com> wrote: >> * Some languages are just fundamentally bad. > > The flexible string representation is a perfect exemple. Wow. A new low for you, jmf... comparing PEP 393 to Ook?!? > In fact, with such a mechanism, it is even impossible to write an editor. And somehow a performance tradeoff makes Python no longer Turing complete. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Languages for different purposes (was Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-10 09:58 +1100
Re: Languages for different purposes (was Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python) wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2013-11-11 01:28 -0800
Re: Languages for different purposes (was Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-11 20:55 +1100
Re: Languages for different purposes (was Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python) Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-11-11 14:40 +0000
Re: Languages for different purposes (was Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python) Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-11-11 09:32 -0800
csiph-web