Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #46394
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.168 |
| X-Spam-Level | * |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.68; '*S*': 0.01; '(except': 0.07; 'implies': 0.16; 'rounding': 0.16; 'saying.': 0.16; 'special.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'wed,': 0.18; '(or': 0.24; 'compare': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'point': 0.28; 'am,': 0.29; 'statement': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'steven': 0.31; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'received:209.85.220': 0.35; 'equal': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'thanks': 0.36; 'error.': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'itself': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'even': 0.60; 'numbers': 0.61; 'more': 0.64; 'different': 0.65; 'special': 0.74; '5.4': 0.84; 'calculations': 0.84; 'rusi': 0.91; '2013': 0.98 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=wH0SZHqknGNX/w8DqKVrLpBqGtnd3v4RlGO5gNQZToc=; b=0hOuk7vTTgwMgAWuX0wXX4UEbKb7Hnc0UozrAxgT/PqBCCxyp9UEz82ILrS7Pc7I9g CUWNadCkwZoqh6bqv7xivmXlv2BiTFXy45IwRvT65zFPiH/P6qUggHg2qyV3QgAyqPRI SKJfrvYPJLnzXRLccym/3tOOMuevAj/jxrK7eUgetwWhUfoam9vXPkN12CgCz26U8fIW dHHm0QXRW4LxcmyMYNG/jJI2isI7oQ96aedAotC8nkT6RmRtZTkafBQyA6uFXHANxSNX d0ug4WJBkrx+Cc34dJpuPG5CCxDGyqj1SaFhI443ozP7q3mAeX+pY1biP7IA9beLhuD5 l2tA== |
| X-Received | by 10.66.144.98 with SMTP id sl2mr4347995pab.92.1369846287613; Wed, 29 May 2013 09:51:27 -0700 (PDT) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <48519aa0-d0cd-4ffc-a2f5-2107465321d8@qn4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> |
| References | <5f101d70-e51f-4531-9153-c92ee2486fd9@googlegroups.com> <51a1fc7b$0$30002$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <2abf4e9c-8c3b-4e2f-80c9-50c1f1d75c9d@googlegroups.com> <51a4b5a1$0$29966$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <04b90c02-833a-4bad-88ad-ab71178b8f79@googlegroups.com> <48519aa0-d0cd-4ffc-a2f5-2107465321d8@qn4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> |
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | Wed, 29 May 2013 10:50:47 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Short-circuit Logic |
| To | Python <python-list@python.org> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2365.1369847746.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 13 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1369847746 news.xs4all.nl 15954 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44772 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:46394 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:33 AM, rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> wrote: > 0.0 == 0.0 implies 5.4 == 5.4 > is not a true statement is what (I think) Steven is saying. > 0 (or if you prefer 0.0) is special and is treated specially. It has nothing to do with 0 being special. A floating point number will always equal itself (except for nan, which is even more special), and in particular 5.4 == 5.4. But if you have two different calculations that produce 0, or two different calculations that produce 5.4, you might actually get two different numbers that approximate 0 or 5.4 thanks to rounding error. If you then compare those two ever-so-slightly different numbers, you will find them unequal.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Short-circuit Logic Ahmed Abdulshafy <abdulshafy@gmail.com> - 2013-05-26 04:11 -0700
Re: Short-circuit Logic Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-05-26 07:38 -0400
Re: Short-circuit Logic Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-26 12:13 +0000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Ahmed Abdulshafy <abdulshafy@gmail.com> - 2013-05-27 13:11 -0700
Re: Short-circuit Logic Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2013-05-28 01:10 +0100
Re: Short-circuit Logic Ahmed Abdulshafy <abdulshafy@gmail.com> - 2013-05-28 01:39 -0700
RE: Short-circuit Logic Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-05-28 12:32 +0300
Re: Short-circuit Logic Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-05-28 12:45 +0100
Re: Short-circuit Logic Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-28 13:51 +0000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-05-28 15:14 +0000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-28 15:55 +0000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-28 13:48 +0000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-29 00:01 +1000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Ahmed Abdulshafy <abdulshafy@gmail.com> - 2013-05-29 07:27 -0700
Re: Short-circuit Logic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-30 00:32 +1000
Re: Short-circuit Logic rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-05-29 07:33 -0700
Re: Short-circuit Logic Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-05-29 10:50 -0600
Re: Short-circuit Logic Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-30 02:28 +0000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-30 13:45 +1000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-30 05:42 +0000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2013-05-30 10:22 +0300
Re: Short-circuit Logic Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-30 08:29 +0000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2013-05-30 12:07 +0300
Re: Short-circuit Logic Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2013-05-30 23:55 +0100
Re: Short-circuit Logic Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-05-30 19:31 -0400
Re: Short-circuit Logic Stefan Drees <stefan@drees.name> - 2013-05-31 17:34 +0200
Re: Short-circuit Logic Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-05-30 08:48 -0400
Re: Short-circuit Logic Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-05-30 19:38 -0400
Re: Short-circuit Logic Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2013-05-31 02:10 +0100
Re: Short-circuit Logic Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-05-30 21:21 -0400
Re: Short-circuit Logic Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-05-30 21:57 -0400
Re: Short-circuit Logic Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-05-30 21:33 -0600
RE: Short-circuit Logic Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-05-31 03:03 +0300
Re: Short-circuit Logic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-30 18:29 +1000
RE: Short-circuit Logic Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-05-31 00:03 +0300
Re: Short-circuit Logic Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-31 05:13 +0000
RE: Short-circuit Logic Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-05-31 09:42 +0300
Re: Short-circuit Logic Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-31 08:11 +0000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-31 17:09 +1000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-31 08:45 +0000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-05-31 09:20 -0400
RE: Short-circuit Logic Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-06-01 10:23 +0300
Re: Short-circuit Logic 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@gmail.com> - 2013-05-30 20:11 -0700
Re: Short-circuit Logic Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-05-29 20:23 -0400
Re: Short-circuit Logic Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-30 05:20 +0000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-30 05:10 +0000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-30 15:22 +1000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-05-30 08:40 -0400
Re: Short-circuit Logic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-30 22:58 +1000
Re: Short-circuit Logic rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-05-30 09:58 -0700
Re: Short-circuit Logic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-31 03:23 +1000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-05-30 17:13 -0700
Re: Short-circuit Logic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-31 12:29 +1000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-05-30 08:02 -0700
Re: Short-circuit Logic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-31 01:56 +1000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-30 16:40 +0000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-30 19:22 +0000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-31 07:46 +1000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-05-30 09:30 -0700
Re: Short-circuit Logic Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-05-30 19:30 +0000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-05-30 13:49 -0600
Re: Short-circuit Logic Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-05-26 16:19 -0400
Re: Short-circuit Logic Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-05-26 16:22 -0400
Re: Short-circuit Logic Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-05-26 17:28 -0400
Re: Short-circuit Logic Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-27 00:40 +0000
Re: Short-circuit Logic Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2013-05-27 11:57 +1000
Re: Short-circuit Logic rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-05-26 21:44 -0700
Re: Short-circuit Logic Vito De Tullio <vito.detullio@gmail.com> - 2013-05-27 06:59 +0200
Re: Short-circuit Logic Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2013-05-27 18:52 +0100
Re: Short-circuit Logic Ahmed Abdulshafy <abdulshafy@gmail.com> - 2013-05-27 13:08 -0700
Re: Short-circuit Logic Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-05-27 21:36 -0400
csiph-web