Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #59057
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.039 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.92; '*S*': 0.00; 'c++,': 0.07; 'subject:code': 0.07; '*is*': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'rewrite': 0.09; 'bug': 0.12; 'buggy': 0.16; 'fixes.': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'oddity': 0.16; 'porting': 0.16; 'referencing': 0.16; 'exception': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'trying': 0.19; 'written': 0.21; 'example': 0.22; 'mon,': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; '(most': 0.33; 'position.': 0.33; 'comment': 0.34; 'something': 0.35; 'johnson': 0.35; 'no,': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'version': 0.36; 'explains': 0.36; "i'll": 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'sometimes': 0.38; 'nov': 0.38; 'handle': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'itself': 0.39; 'supporting': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'even': 0.60; 'new': 0.61; 'simply': 0.61; 'subject:The': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'due': 0.66; 'benefit': 0.68; 'frequently': 0.68; 'hardly': 0.84; 'proves': 0.84; 'rick': 0.93; 'contrary': 0.95; '2013': 0.98 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=7seiuNtufZnVoNfNtlyqoSMb+lXnsFImTeqbP90TOEI=; b=LxuRpplo8WxLLBuUAMW7hQA4rbaL0xq8EghToI1yEpuVi3dBmjoGD7gGg/Ejf9pv9t S5miFB5eXWmDNmpsAzLLlhVFsx94IJFbGplkfGwRxAEwiw3hKwTz67/rYHNR7P75YjTv SofylJ+ZDiFOWD4t32Am6nuPXDRR38yS7SvV//AbXOrwUzrB2hoyqgxAAbptOSrOu36W 6H/udw8YfnwF/9E1qJJYPcrkYId07FIdkeGrV6zBpXz6Ldib3rnQSju00OlxeRnw4ldB dXMMVTi7LgSzmHGIUYDjb4yCygSSasoiCch4K1Xo9CbtoTQFKfXi1QaXFhpxMz84JxO7 244w== |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| X-Received | by 10.68.197.234 with SMTP id ix10mr394692pbc.185.1384163598858; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 01:53:18 -0800 (PST) |
| In-Reply-To | <l5q7ph$5te$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| References | <527e2d9c$0$29972$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <b794f36e-d43e-428e-b8e5-adcf986fabfc@googlegroups.com> <l5q7ph$5te$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| Date | Mon, 11 Nov 2013 20:53:18 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: The narcissism of small code differences |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2364.1384163608.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 25 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1384163608 news.xs4all.nl 15903 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:48312 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:59057 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On 11/11/2013 06:50, Rick Johnson wrote: >> In a nutshell the author attempts to plead for the >> "longevity" of "old code bases" simply on the basis of his >> assertion that "old code bases" are "less buggy" and >> contain more "wisdom" than their new brethren -- both of >> which are absurd conclusions! >> > > I recall that the demise of Netscape was due to them trying to completely > rewrite code of this nature. The exception that proves the rule? No, I would say Netscape's experience is a strong supporting example of the contrary position. I've frequently had need to reimplement something (most recently as part of porting functionality from RosMud, written in C++, to Gypsum, written in Pike), and referencing the old code is the best way to benefit from X years of corner-case discoveries and bug fixes. Sometimes I'll even copy and paste a comment from one version to another, because it perfectly explains some oddity that the code has to handle - even if the code itself is completely rewritten. Definitely if hunks of code can be kept, they should be. The old code base *IS* less buggy and contains more wisdom. Hardly absurd. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The narcissism of small code differences Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-11-09 12:42 +0000
Re: The narcissism of small code differences Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-11-09 13:02 +0000
Re: The narcissism of small code differences Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-11-10 22:50 -0800
Re: The narcissism of small code differences Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-11-11 09:25 +0000
Re: The narcissism of small code differences Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-11 20:53 +1100
csiph-web