Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #8109
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder.news-service.com!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!news2.euro.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.001 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'iterate': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'received:gator410.hostgator.com': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; 'wrote:': 0.14; '(assuming': 0.16; 'billy': 0.16; 'received:72.11': 0.16; 'received:72.11.125': 0.16; 'received:72.11.125.166': 0.16; 'received:gateway13.websitewelcome.com': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python- list': 0.17; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.21; 'cc:2**0': 0.22; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.23; 'indices': 0.23; 'code': 0.24; 'index': 0.25; 'subject:?': 0.29; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.30; 'iterating': 0.30; 'it.': 0.31; 'does': 0.33; 'actually': 0.33; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.35; 'could': 0.38; 'cases,': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'your': 0.60; 'received:websitewelcome.com': 0.67; 'subject:over': 0.84 |
| Date | Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:35:42 -0700 |
| From | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
| User-Agent | Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| To | Billy Mays <noway@nohow.com> |
| Subject | Re: Better way to iterate over indices? |
| References | <itqmkb$h56$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In-Reply-To | <itqmkb$h56$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-AntiAbuse | This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report |
| X-AntiAbuse | Primary Hostname - gator410.hostgator.com |
| X-AntiAbuse | Original Domain - python.org |
| X-AntiAbuse | Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] |
| X-AntiAbuse | Sender Address Domain - stoneleaf.us |
| X-BWhitelist | no |
| X-Source | |
| X-Source-Args | |
| X-Source-Dir | |
| X-Source-Sender | mail.admailinc.com ([192.168.10.136]) [72.11.125.166]:3658 |
| X-Source-Auth | ethan+stoneleaf.us |
| X-Email-Count | 3 |
| X-Source-Cap | dG9idWs7dG9idWs7Z2F0b3I0MTAuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ== |
| Cc | python-list@python.org |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.235.1308680515.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 23 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 82.94.164.166 |
| X-Trace | 1308680515 news.xs4all.nl 49038 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:49595 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:8109 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Billy Mays wrote:
> I have always found that iterating over the indices of a list/tuple is
> not very clean:
>
> for i in range(len(myList)):
> doStuff(i, myList[i])
Definitely not beautiful. ;)
> I know I could use enumerate:
>
> for i, v in enumerate(myList):
> doStuff(i, myList[i])
If you actually need the index, then this is the way to do it. Note
that in most cases, you don't need the index and can iterate directly:
for v in myList:
doStuff(v)
From your sample code (assuming you don't need i) this does the same thing.
~Ethan~
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Better way to iterate over indices? Billy Mays <noway@nohow.com> - 2011-06-21 14:05 -0400 Re: Better way to iterate over indices? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 12:15 -0600 Re: Better way to iterate over indices? Noah Hall <enalicho@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 19:19 +0100 Re: Better way to iterate over indices? Benjamin Kaplan <benjamin.kaplan@case.edu> - 2011-06-21 11:20 -0700 Re: Better way to iterate over indices? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-06-21 11:35 -0700
csiph-web