Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder.news-service.com!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!news2.euro.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'iterate': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'received:gator410.hostgator.com': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; 'wrote:': 0.14; '(assuming': 0.16; 'billy': 0.16; 'received:72.11': 0.16; 'received:72.11.125': 0.16; 'received:72.11.125.166': 0.16; 'received:gateway13.websitewelcome.com': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python- list': 0.17; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.21; 'cc:2**0': 0.22; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.23; 'indices': 0.23; 'code': 0.24; 'index': 0.25; 'subject:?': 0.29; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.30; 'iterating': 0.30; 'it.': 0.31; 'does': 0.33; 'actually': 0.33; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.35; 'could': 0.38; 'cases,': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'your': 0.60; 'received:websitewelcome.com': 0.67; 'subject:over': 0.84 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:35:42 -0700 From: Ethan Furman User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Billy Mays Subject: Re: Better way to iterate over indices? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator410.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - python.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - stoneleaf.us X-BWhitelist: no X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: mail.admailinc.com ([192.168.10.136]) [72.11.125.166]:3658 X-Source-Auth: ethan+stoneleaf.us X-Email-Count: 3 X-Source-Cap: dG9idWs7dG9idWs7Z2F0b3I0MTAuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ== Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 23 NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166 X-Trace: 1308680515 news.xs4all.nl 49038 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:49595 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:8109 Billy Mays wrote: > I have always found that iterating over the indices of a list/tuple is > not very clean: > > for i in range(len(myList)): > doStuff(i, myList[i]) Definitely not beautiful. ;) > I know I could use enumerate: > > for i, v in enumerate(myList): > doStuff(i, myList[i]) If you actually need the index, then this is the way to do it. Note that in most cases, you don't need the index and can iterate directly: for v in myList: doStuff(v) From your sample code (assuming you don't need i) this does the same thing. ~Ethan~