Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #31512

Re: list comprehension question

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <d@davea.name>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.052
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.90; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:skip:c 10': 0.07; 'subject:question': 0.08; 'missed': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'def': 0.10; 'oct': 0.16; 'reminding': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; '>>>': 0.18; 'import': 0.21; "i'd": 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'kevin': 0.23; 'seems': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'correct': 0.28; 'subject:list': 0.28; '>>>>': 0.29; 'faster,': 0.29; 'loop,': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'maybe': 0.29; 'suggestion': 0.32; 'function.': 0.33; 'much.': 0.33; 'likely': 0.33; 'list': 0.35; 'faster': 0.35; 'said,': 0.35; 'doing': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'too': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'received:192': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'help': 0.40; 'most': 0.61; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.65; 'sum': 0.66; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.68; 'received:74.208': 0.71; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.72; '10%': 0.81; 'improvement': 0.84; 'received:74.208.4.194': 0.84; 'rusi': 0.91; 'angel': 0.93
Date Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:36:38 -0400
From Dave Angel <d@davea.name>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version 1.0
To rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com>
Subject Re: list comprehension question
References <CA+C4C6f=24oD4seHY_-h1F0GMvBTWNYbzTABXOdtKkAZtE9hdQ@mail.gmail.com> <507E145E.9060008@davea.name> <CA+C4C6cjha4bMZ9gyx5fTp0c_nfFQxRGu31dGNMjgHQBu73=ig@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.2341.1350477185.27098.python-list@python.org> <61d76114-3021-4a3b-9943-1e81147d3ce1@6g2000pbh.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To <61d76114-3021-4a3b-9943-1e81147d3ce1@6g2000pbh.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Provags-ID V02:K0:ks7v8B/gDr8HZ6+GGgMFYgznX6GqNTHWgeMEHmxW4rt hD5+Cem52htvkrbIfVBlssq2eq6rdOHqxlQz5bklBsqKS31c+S /1zf/auIrH4h5gZWoX9z71d1DsLThQ9eEIpDz1t1sU7afZXLUr 5+/bttJLIPPOL43u3S6tZdD5LZX+0NQEe513z7/N9D3SsH00gz O3FFTJ051vU4bIieSOEWMVTtRXY7MAg2qKqJiT533Qn34jcZlF 8rQsYQWXBoGIpvOeTUqdgDh2kT4Mjwcjg/tpD1d9YcdmA5Q2AP OTKxyEXquqN9uglZ2Ex8WMGhDgtMPvzWDB63bPqwDY5E+ARuA= =
Cc python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
Reply-To d@davea.name
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2348.1350484621.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 36
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1350484621 news.xs4all.nl 6939 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59410
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:31512

Show key headers only | View raw


On 10/17/2012 10:06 AM, rusi wrote:
> On Oct 17, 5:33 pm, Dave Angel <d...@davea.name> wrote:
>> On 10/17/2012 12:43 AM, Kevin Anthony wrote:> Is it not true that list comprehension is much faster the the for loops?
>>
>>> If it is not the correct way of doing this, i appoligize.
>>> Like i said, I'm learing list comprehension.
>> list comprehensions CAN be much faster, but not necessarily.  The most
>> complex a loop, the less likely it'll help much.
> One-lining the comprehension seems to make a difference of about 10%
> out here. Maybe Ive missed something? Seems too large…
>
> # My original suggestion
> def dot(p,q): return sum (x*y for x,y in zip(p,q))
> def transpose(m): return zip(*m)
> def mm(a,b): return mmt(a, transpose(b))
> def mmt(a,b): return [[dot(ra, rb) for rb in b] for ra in a]
>
> # One-liner (Thanks Hans for reminding me of sum)
>
> def mm1(a,b): return [[sum([x*y for x,y in zip(ra,rb)]) for rb in
> zip(*b)] for ra in a]
>
>>>> t1=Timer("res=mm1(m,m)", setup="from __main__ import mm1, m")
>>>> t1.timeit(1000)
> 12.276363849639893
>>>> t0=Timer("res=mm(m,m)", setup="from __main__ import mm, m")
>>>> t0.timeit(1000)
> 13.453603029251099

And I'd wager all the improvement is in the inner loop, the dot() function.


-- 

DaveA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: list comprehension question Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-10-17 08:32 -0400
  Re: list comprehension question rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-10-17 07:06 -0700
    Re: list comprehension question rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-10-17 07:33 -0700
    Re: list comprehension question Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-10-17 10:36 -0400
      Re: list comprehension question 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-10-17 07:45 -0700
      Re: list comprehension question 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-10-17 07:45 -0700
      Re: list comprehension question rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-10-17 07:50 -0700
        Re: list comprehension question 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-10-17 08:06 -0700

csiph-web