Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #59000
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.002 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'attribute': 0.07; 'expressions': 0.07; 'literal': 0.09; 'parsing': 0.09; 'works.': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'def': 0.12; 'different?': 0.16; 'earlier.': 0.16; 'magic': 0.16; 'operators,': 0.16; 'quirks': 0.16; 'rule.': 0.16; 'subject:user': 0.16; 'sup': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'somewhere': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'class': 0.32; 'languages': 0.32; 'cases': 0.33; 'skip:_ 10': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'subject:New': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'nov': 0.38; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'little': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'aside': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'subject: / ': 0.60; 'break': 0.61; 'mentioned': 0.61; '2013': 0.98 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=q+QvJcEx20lEwtttPu76t78+2+0xITIxzL18s9tR7l8=; b=RzHx5PZolD3vPJKWb4xscKtCDedhvjHunvy7nxQQAcB/34t4qqCQhh00OiBSx/w81R s7I+NA3wra7FkgL23uAJOxme0gBENpq4BchLTEZP0FaurlzAC87wFv+9UR3COKrKo7E9 74d92lp+/da0OaiJ4Mo/B7OVm7xwLKwFWs7tp6t1AbCnNX/CJ8yKrTIFt+15N/cXoiOi h1Q4MI9NGfZVImJ25zlMDA8rW1uZ/NeozLysuvx52k+FLz+tzvdUwzY9uAtgBJNTJcJd CjQ9BicremyiscE/uxesalFp8klTE0uiP3/LYMcLbb7AyUWyv5zZnCVoYFto1nNygTVx oL1Q== |
| X-Received | by 10.66.118.71 with SMTP id kk7mr25721967pab.14.1384083580261; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 03:39:40 -0800 (PST) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <CAPTjJmrXk051X8MiVhg-eQY6BnCq4zxEy9B2=bRSUsxjsBt1xA@mail.gmail.com> |
| References | <-JadnUirYuhUruPPnZ2dnUVZ8rSdnZ2d@bt.com> <mailman.2297.1384007240.18130.python-list@python.org> <slrnl7ui1a.2m9.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> <CAPTjJmrXk051X8MiVhg-eQY6BnCq4zxEy9B2=bRSUsxjsBt1xA@mail.gmail.com> |
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | Sun, 10 Nov 2013 04:39:00 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python |
| To | Python <python-list@python.org> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2331.1384083584.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 19 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1384083584 news.xs4all.nl 15927 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:33711 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:59000 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
> JavaScript has magic around the dot and function-call operators, as I
> mentioned earlier. Lots of other languages have some little quirk
> somewhere that breaks this rule; some have a LOT of quirks that break
> this rule. Does Python have any? Aside from parsing oddities like
> attribute access on a literal integer[1], are there any cases where
> two expressions yielding the same object are in any way different?
I can think of one:
class Spam:
def __init__(self):
super().__init__() # This works.
sup = super
class Eggs:
def __init__(self):
sup().__init__() # This doesn't.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python John von Horn <j.h69@btinternet.com> - 2013-11-09 07:08 -0600
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-11-09 05:22 -0800
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> - 2013-11-09 13:27 +0000
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Jonathan <jtcegh@gmail.com> - 2013-11-09 14:44 -0800
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-10 10:29 +1100
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-11-10 00:50 +0000
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-10 11:54 +1100
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-11-11 15:30 +0000
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2013-11-10 13:24 +0100
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-11-09 13:41 +0000
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2013-11-09 16:24 +0200
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-10 01:27 +1100
Sandboxing Python [was Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python] Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-11-09 15:25 +0000
Re: Sandboxing Python [was Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python] Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-10 02:32 +1100
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2013-11-10 08:47 +0000
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-10 20:22 +1100
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-11-10 04:39 -0700
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-10 22:43 +1100
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-11-10 12:12 -0500
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-11 10:29 +1100
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-11-10 19:13 -0500
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-11-09 07:38 -0800
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-11-09 10:56 -0500
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-11-09 08:30 -0800
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-11-10 21:36 -0800
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-11-11 09:01 -0500
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-11-11 07:14 -0800
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-11-11 21:05 -0500
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-11-12 14:38 -0800
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python John von Horn <j.h69@btinternet.com> - 2013-11-09 14:19 -0600
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-11-09 14:39 -0600
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2013-11-09 12:33 -0800
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-11-09 12:54 -0800
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2013-11-09 13:21 -0800
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-11-09 21:01 +0000
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-11-09 15:20 -0600
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python lorenzo.gatti@gmail.com - 2013-11-11 02:09 -0800
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-11 21:39 +1100
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-11-11 11:17 +0000
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-11 22:32 +1100
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2013-11-11 14:29 -0800
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2013-11-11 11:53 +0000
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-11 23:07 +1100
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> - 2013-11-11 20:50 +0000
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-12 09:21 +1100
Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> - 2013-11-12 01:53 +0000
csiph-web