Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #39590
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.004 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'mysql,': 0.07; 'etc).': 0.09; 'postgres': 0.09; 'postgresql,': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'record.': 0.09; 'sqlite': 0.09; '(the': 0.15; '(setting': 0.16; 'competitor': 0.16; 'competitors': 0.16; 'crud': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'whatever,': 0.16; 'thanks,': 0.18; 'handles': 0.18; 'app': 0.19; 'load': 0.19; 'sort': 0.21; 'trying': 0.21; 'do.': 0.21; 'apps': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'handling': 0.27; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'concern': 0.29; 'handful': 0.29; 'handled': 0.29; 'point': 0.31; 'could': 0.32; 'point,': 0.33; 'handle': 0.33; 'problem': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'likely': 0.33; 'entry': 0.33; 'thanks': 0.34; 'doing': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'really': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'closing': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'enough': 0.36; 'why': 0.37; 'data': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'things': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'application': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'most': 0.61; 'director': 0.62; 'situation': 0.62; 'personal': 0.62; 'different': 0.63; 'wanting': 0.65; 'fly,': 0.84; 'locally': 0.84; 'monte': 0.84; 'reading!': 0.84; 'subject:over': 0.84 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Monte Milanuk <memilanuk@gmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: PyQT app accessible over network? |
| Date | Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:50:05 -0800 |
| References | <mailman.2180.1361463791.2939.python-list@python.org> <20130222164513.9377097f0cf2add2a6d16204@gmx.net> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | 66.172.107.27 |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
| In-Reply-To | <20130222164513.9377097f0cf2add2a6d16204@gmx.net> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2283.1361551820.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 33 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1361551820 news.xs4all.nl 6905 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:53957 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:39590 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Yes, I am looking at a database-centric application. I know that the 'larger' databases such as PostgreSQL, MySQL, etc. would not have any problem handling that small amount of traffic. My concern is that using postgres or mysql for this would be akin to using a sledgehammer to swat a fly, when sqlite could most likely handle the load well enough (I think) since the handful of people doing data entry would rarely (if ever) be trying to write to the same record. That would be the whole point of having multiple people doing data entry in this situation - each one handling a different competitors entry form or submitted scores. My other reason for wanting one 'central' app is that there are various functions (setting up the tournament, closing registration, editing scores, finalizing results) that I really *don't* want the satellite/client apps to be able to do. My personal view is that sort of thing needs to be handled from one point, by one person (the match director or chief stats officer, depending on the size of the event). That is why I was looking at things in terms of having one central app that handles the database, whether locally via sqlite or postgres or whatever, but have the clients access go through that main application in order to ensure that all they have is a limited set of CRUD abilities for competitor registration and entering scores. Thanks for the links... some of those I was already aware of (Camelot, Dabo) but some of the others are new (QtAlchemy, etc). Should make for interesting reading! Thanks, Monte
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
PyQT app accessible over network? Monte Milanuk <memilanuk@gmail.com> - 2013-02-21 08:22 -0800
Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net> - 2013-02-22 16:45 +0100
Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Monte Milanuk <memilanuk@gmail.com> - 2013-02-22 08:50 -0800
Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net> - 2013-02-24 15:30 +0100
Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> - 2013-02-23 03:57 +1100
Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Monte Milanuk <memilanuk@gmail.com> - 2013-02-22 13:49 -0800
Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-02-22 16:37 -0700
Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net> - 2013-02-24 15:31 +0100
Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-25 01:58 +1100
Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Frank Millman <frank@chagford.com> - 2013-02-25 08:14 +0200
Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-25 17:35 +1100
Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Frank Millman <frank@chagford.com> - 2013-02-25 10:02 +0200
Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-02-25 18:26 -0500
Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-02-25 18:32 -0500
Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-26 17:26 +1100
Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-02-22 19:20 -0500
Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-23 11:32 +1100
Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> - 2013-02-24 20:00 +1100
csiph-web