Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #39738

Re: PyQT app accessible over network?

References (1 earlier) <20130222164513.9377097f0cf2add2a6d16204@gmx.net> <kg87jq$kfd$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAO+9iGdCtzkkp=p5aA96qA9wqz+QDHc8mZTKwqUqpcd1ZUfFuA@mail.gmail.com> <kg8p5a$9en$1@ger.gmane.org> <51280124.20905@gmail.com>
Date 2013-02-24 20:00 +1100
Subject Re: PyQT app accessible over network?
From Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2398.1361696465.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 02/22/2013 02:49 PM, Monte Milanuk wrote:
>> Web2py does seem pretty attractive in that it seems to come with a lot
>> of functionality rolled in already.  It seems to be pretty easy to
>> deploy... since this would be more of a case where the volunteer match
>> directors are not necessarily computer gurus, and something that can
>> literally run from a USB stick on nearly any computer has its benefits.
>>   I've seen some examples (I think) of twitter-bootstrap in some other
>> demos of flask, and it looked reasonably attractive without being too
>> over the top.  web2py's DAL seems fairly straight-forward too.  Looks
>> like I may have to get more fluent in CSS & javascript, though...
>
> If you just use web2py to implement the database calls and business
> logic, and to implement a simple, clean API (RPC really) for the clients
> to talk to, then you can still use your non-web UI tools like PyQt.  But
> as an added bonus you can do a web interface as well.  You'll have
> flexibility either way.  A client is a client, whether it's web-bases
> and running on the same server, or a remote app using RPC over HTTP.
>
> I think all web-based apps should expose a web service (an API).  that
> way you have flexibility to do a variety of front-ends.  Normal web
> browser, mobile browser, a standalone app (think android or iphone).
>
> As far as doing client/server stuff with just a database engine, unless
> you have tight control over the environment end to end, from a security
> pov, it's not a good idea to expose the database engine itself to the
> internet.  Better to put a restricted web services API in front of it
> that handles all the authorization needs (access-control) on the
> detailed level that you require.
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Michael Torrie: Have seen a few PyWt examples in alpha if that's what
you describing…

But there would still be more implementation overhead then just using
e.g.: SQLFORM(db.table_name) to create a CRUD form.

I don't see any disadvantage of using web2py for everything; unless
we're talking decentralised infrastructure in which case a queuing
mechanism would likely be better; and have each client implement a
server as well. (thus still no use-case for Qt).

Also SQLite has a number of excellent features, namely 2 file deployments.

So it's very portable. Otherwise for postgres or mysql you'd probably
need to package in your own silent installer (which admittedly isn't
overly difficult; but is quite involved)…

On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Monte Milanuk <memilanuk@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks like I may have to get more fluent in
> CSS & javascript, though...

Understanding how `style` attributes work, how to use FireBug (or
Chrome Dev Tools); and finding a good javascript widget library (e.g.:
from Twitter Bootstrap) should be more than enough for your project.

In fact; it's been enough for almost all my projects!

(though now I'm moving to AngularJS will need to get more involved on
the js front :P)

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

PyQT app accessible over network? Monte Milanuk <memilanuk@gmail.com> - 2013-02-21 08:22 -0800
  Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net> - 2013-02-22 16:45 +0100
    Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Monte Milanuk <memilanuk@gmail.com> - 2013-02-22 08:50 -0800
      Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net> - 2013-02-24 15:30 +0100
    Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> - 2013-02-23 03:57 +1100
    Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Monte Milanuk <memilanuk@gmail.com> - 2013-02-22 13:49 -0800
    Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-02-22 16:37 -0700
      Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net> - 2013-02-24 15:31 +0100
        Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-25 01:58 +1100
        Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Frank Millman <frank@chagford.com> - 2013-02-25 08:14 +0200
        Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-25 17:35 +1100
        Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Frank Millman <frank@chagford.com> - 2013-02-25 10:02 +0200
        Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-02-25 18:26 -0500
        Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-02-25 18:32 -0500
        Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-26 17:26 +1100
    Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-02-22 19:20 -0500
    Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-23 11:32 +1100
    Re: PyQT app accessible over network? Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> - 2013-02-24 20:00 +1100

csiph-web