Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #39557

Re: FYI: AI-programmer

From Gisle Vanem <gvanem@broadpark.no>
References <4CACF5BFEFC24638A0D8007921722FB8@dev.null> <CAPTjJmq4NNoR9wcq9KSjWOd_bu8gdQ8iuwNVGK-qy1niOJUh_A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject Re: FYI: AI-programmer
Date 2013-02-22 14:03 +0100
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2260.1361538220.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


"Chris Angelico" <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:

> That's not artificial intelligence, though. It's artificial program
> generation based on a known target output. The "Fitness" calculation
> is based on a specific target string. This is fine for devising a
> program that will produce the entire works of Shakespeare, since there

You mean, art generation (writing Shakespearian texts) is a process of 
generating "known target output"?. If we talk about good art (not kitch),
I disagree. For reference, "Infinite Monkey Teorem" is at 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem

Disregarding the probability math in the above, the question IMHO boils 
down to whether "art can be produced by accident" (quote from above). 
I seems to recall elephant painting selling for lots of dollars some years ago. 
And long dull poems written by computers. Fooled a lot of people.

> As suggested in RFC 2795 [1], the resources required to implement such
> a project would also have other uses. Like the Infinite Improbability
> Drive,

I did notice that RFC was written on 1 April 2000 :-)

--gv

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: FYI: AI-programmer Gisle Vanem <gvanem@broadpark.no> - 2013-02-22 14:03 +0100
  Re: FYI: AI-programmer Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-02-22 15:07 +0000

csiph-web