Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #39557
| From | Gisle Vanem <gvanem@broadpark.no> |
|---|---|
| References | <4CACF5BFEFC24638A0D8007921722FB8@dev.null> <CAPTjJmq4NNoR9wcq9KSjWOd_bu8gdQ8iuwNVGK-qy1niOJUh_A@mail.gmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: FYI: AI-programmer |
| Date | 2013-02-22 14:03 +0100 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2260.1361538220.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
"Chris Angelico" <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote: > That's not artificial intelligence, though. It's artificial program > generation based on a known target output. The "Fitness" calculation > is based on a specific target string. This is fine for devising a > program that will produce the entire works of Shakespeare, since there You mean, art generation (writing Shakespearian texts) is a process of generating "known target output"?. If we talk about good art (not kitch), I disagree. For reference, "Infinite Monkey Teorem" is at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem Disregarding the probability math in the above, the question IMHO boils down to whether "art can be produced by accident" (quote from above). I seems to recall elephant painting selling for lots of dollars some years ago. And long dull poems written by computers. Fooled a lot of people. > As suggested in RFC 2795 [1], the resources required to implement such > a project would also have other uses. Like the Infinite Improbability > Drive, I did notice that RFC was written on 1 April 2000 :-) --gv
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: FYI: AI-programmer Gisle Vanem <gvanem@broadpark.no> - 2013-02-22 14:03 +0100 Re: FYI: AI-programmer Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-02-22 15:07 +0000
csiph-web