Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.043
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.92; 'S': 0.00; 'true,': 0.05; 'php.': 0.07; 'subject:question': 0.10; 'ah,': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'mean,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'thu,': 0.19; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'feature': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'idea,': 0.31; 'option': 0.32; 'week.': 0.33; 'implemented': 0.33; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'received:209.85.220': 0.35; 'requirement': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'received:209': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; '26,': 0.68; 'nobody': 0.68; 'hey,': 0.75; 'regexp': 0.84; '2013': 0.98
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=TJl8+7/FzHVAFq2famZnNdljLYl+g57bCQyrW8kS/lI=; b=pHolp2y2PBwHDgiWC0QHZpGCscF03rY0Vf9m9K+K6xWn2c4SqCtvuuDIX8GDyc73mj DRJy3KPUAiPnny2qHSg7cfM+acx6b+px7uigskyuwWc0IXcKgZu4I7A+Spt/KTCNt7eT oEpty5gOCgrBJzOhrAPmvx4oygucXNRuZVMfy33ZuUfO9qi+hKYG1bI2+xIiaPR6QliF EoFYqJCmQHkNxAeF8k2+HxjMpS1kA6khH2bxMi+fUet3IbNVgR4fY3D6G4iiIR4VYrZR 0AGAd3RPSOOOUOGuoJ7RFJwZ9ex5E6bDoDsvcFEzlhtKLJjkqqjyuft39/knqmzwmD+y TOTA==
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Received	by 10.52.164.163 with SMTP id yr3mr9848754vdb.76.1369506786895; Sat, 25 May 2013 11:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To	<pan.2013.05.25.18.27.14.22000@nowhere.com>
References	<534d7800-14c1-430b-85fb-dd703c2acc4d@googlegroups.com> <c8d5972d-9b11-4885-a68d-6ce1d0414718@googlegroups.com> <IGbnt.31113$LC7.15822@fx06.am4> <519d9f71$0$1591$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.com> <knkfeh$rr4$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.1999.1369294009.3114.python-list@python.org> <pan.2013.05.25.18.27.14.22000@nowhere.com>
Date	Sun, 26 May 2013 04:33:06 +1000
Subject	Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses
From	Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
To	python-list@python.org
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.2150.1369506790.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	14
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1369506790 news.xs4all.nl 16009 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:49849
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:46020

Show key headers only | View raw

On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 17:20:19 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> Aside: Why was PHP's /e regexp option ever implemented?
>
> Because it's a stupid idea, and that's the only requirement for a feature
> to be implemented in PHP.

Hey, don't be rude. I mean, not that it isn't true, but it's still
rude to say it.

Ah, who am I kidding. Be as rude as you like. I have to work with PHP all week.

ChrisA

Thread

Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses "C. N. Desrosiers" <cndesrosiers@gmail.com> - 2013-05-21 23:23 -0700
  Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-05-22 07:35 +0100
    Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses "C. N. Desrosiers" <cndesrosiers@gmail.com> - 2013-05-21 23:52 -0700
  Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Kevin Xi <kevin.xgr@gmail.com> - 2013-05-21 23:52 -0700
    Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-22 17:19 +1000
    Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2013-05-22 22:31 +0000
      RE: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-05-23 01:55 +0300
      Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Kevin Xi <kevin.xgr@gmail.com> - 2013-05-22 18:56 -0700
      Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-23 04:47 +0000
        Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-23 16:04 +1000
        Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-05-23 03:11 -0400
        Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-23 17:20 +1000
          Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2013-05-25 19:27 +0100
            Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-26 04:33 +1000
            Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-05-25 23:11 +0100
      Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-05-23 18:51 -0400

csiph-web