Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #45782
| References | <534d7800-14c1-430b-85fb-dd703c2acc4d@googlegroups.com> <c8d5972d-9b11-4885-a68d-6ce1d0414718@googlegroups.com> <IGbnt.31113$LC7.15822@fx06.am4> <519d9f71$0$1591$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.com> <knkfeh$rr4$1@ger.gmane.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-05-23 17:20 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1999.1369294009.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote: > On 5/23/2013 12:47 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> >> On Wed, 22 May 2013 22:31:04 +0000, Alister wrote: >> >>> Please write out 1000 time (without using any form of loop) >>> >>> "NEVER use input in python <3.0 it is EVIL"* > > >> But all joking aside, eval is dangerous, yes, but it is not "evil". > > > He put that label on *input*, not eval -- I presume for hiding dangerous > eval. Aside: Why was PHP's /e regexp option ever implemented? I can understand evalling inputted text - that's how you write an interactive interpreter. But why would you arbitrarily eval the result of a regexp replacement? That seems... really weird. Like building a gun with a "Reverse" switch that fires the bullet down the butt instead of the barrel. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses "C. N. Desrosiers" <cndesrosiers@gmail.com> - 2013-05-21 23:23 -0700
Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-05-22 07:35 +0100
Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses "C. N. Desrosiers" <cndesrosiers@gmail.com> - 2013-05-21 23:52 -0700
Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Kevin Xi <kevin.xgr@gmail.com> - 2013-05-21 23:52 -0700
Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-22 17:19 +1000
Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2013-05-22 22:31 +0000
RE: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-05-23 01:55 +0300
Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Kevin Xi <kevin.xgr@gmail.com> - 2013-05-22 18:56 -0700
Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-23 04:47 +0000
Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-23 16:04 +1000
Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-05-23 03:11 -0400
Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-23 17:20 +1000
Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2013-05-25 19:27 +0100
Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-26 04:33 +1000
Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-05-25 23:11 +0100
Re: Newbie question about evaluating raw_input() responses Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-05-23 18:51 -0400
csiph-web