Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #39375

Re: Is Python "venerable"?

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!cs.uu.nl!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.005
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; '-0500': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'language': 0.14; '"...': 0.16; '(psf)': 0.16; 'no)': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'stuff.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'feb': 0.19; '(not': 0.20; 'foundation': 0.20; 'programming': 0.23; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'then.': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'non-profit': 0.29; 'point': 0.31; 'switch': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'doing': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'really': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'supporting': 0.37; 'being': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'things': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'called': 0.39; 'where': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'world': 0.63; 'kids,': 0.65; 'url:tinyurl': 0.66; 'smith': 0.71; '2013': 0.84; 'cobol': 0.84; 'received:sd.cox.net': 0.84
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com>
Subject Re: Is Python "venerable"?
Date Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:29:48 -0800
References <roy-198D2A.21455319022013@news.panix.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host ip68-227-87-145.sb.sd.cox.net
User-Agent dsodnetnin
X-Mailer EZnn0.37p
X-Newsreader EZnn0.37p
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host EZnn0.37p
Original-Received from slem by 1.1 with local
X-No-Archive yes
Archive no
X-Archive expiry=11
X-Archive encrypt
X-Operating-System Barebones_6.1
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host 192.168.1.1
X-NNTP-Posting-Host 192.168.1.1
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2125.1361388587.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 20
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1361388587 news.xs4all.nl 6943 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54318
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:39375

Show key headers only | View raw

On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:45:53 -0500
Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> wrote:

> A quote from Computer World (http://tinyurl.com/bxqjed8):
> 
> "... the Python Software Foundation (PSF) - a non-profit supporting
> the venerable Python programming language ..."
> 
> Venerable?  Come on.  Fortran is venerable.  Cobol is venerable.  Old 
> farts use things that are venerable.  I don't want to be an old fart 
> (not that I have much say in the matter).
> 
> I use Python because I want to be one of the cool kids, doing new hip 
> stuff.  Has the language really progressed to the point where it's
> being called "venerable"?  If I want to be one of the cool kids, am I
> now going to have to switch to Lua or Scala or (please, no)
> JavaScript?

ECMAScript then.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Is Python "venerable"? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-02-19 21:45 -0500
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-02-20 03:09 +0000
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Barry W Brown <brownbar@gmail.com> - 2013-02-19 19:53 -0800
    Re: Is Python "venerable"? Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2013-02-20 16:03 +0000
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-02-19 23:03 -0500
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-20 04:15 +0000
    Re: Is Python "venerable"? rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> - 2013-02-20 11:28 -0800
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2013-02-19 23:10 -0500
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-02-19 20:42 -0800
    Re: Is Python "venerable"? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 09:08 +0000
      Re: Is Python "venerable"? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 20:20 +1100
        Re: Is Python "venerable"? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 02:49 -0800
    Re: Is Python "venerable"? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-02-20 10:19 +0100
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Albert Hopkins <marduk@letterboxes.org> - 2013-02-20 06:03 -0500
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Steve Simmons <square.steve@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 12:35 +0100
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 22:45 +1100
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> - 2013-02-20 11:29 -0800
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2013-02-20 10:33 -0500

csiph-web