Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!cs.uu.nl!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.005 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; '-0500': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'language': 0.14; '"...': 0.16; '(psf)': 0.16; 'no)': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'stuff.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'feb': 0.19; '(not': 0.20; 'foundation': 0.20; 'programming': 0.23; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'then.': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'non-profit': 0.29; 'point': 0.31; 'switch': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'doing': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'really': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'supporting': 0.37; 'being': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'things': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'called': 0.39; 'where': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'world': 0.63; 'kids,': 0.65; 'url:tinyurl': 0.66; 'smith': 0.71; '2013': 0.84; 'cobol': 0.84; 'received:sd.cox.net': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: rh Subject: Re: Is Python "venerable"? Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:29:48 -0800 References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-227-87-145.sb.sd.cox.net User-Agent: dsodnetnin X-Mailer: EZnn0.37p X-Newsreader: EZnn0.37p X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: EZnn0.37p Original-Received: from slem by 1.1 with local X-No-Archive: yes Archive: no X-Archive: expiry=11 X-Archive: encrypt X-Operating-System: Barebones_6.1 X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.168.1.1 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.168.1.1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 20 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1361388587 news.xs4all.nl 6943 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54318 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:39375 On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:45:53 -0500 Roy Smith wrote: > A quote from Computer World (http://tinyurl.com/bxqjed8): > > "... the Python Software Foundation (PSF) - a non-profit supporting > the venerable Python programming language ..." > > Venerable? Come on. Fortran is venerable. Cobol is venerable. Old > farts use things that are venerable. I don't want to be an old fart > (not that I have much say in the matter). > > I use Python because I want to be one of the cool kids, doing new hip > stuff. Has the language really progressed to the point where it's > being called "venerable"? If I want to be one of the cool kids, am I > now going to have to switch to Lua or Scala or (please, no) > JavaScript? ECMAScript then.