Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #39311

Re: Is Python "venerable"?

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <gheskett@wdtv.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.088
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.82; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'mrab': 0.05; 'python': 0.09; 'useless': 0.09; 'language': 0.14; '"...': 0.16; '(psf)': 0.16; 'no)': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'soap,': 0.16; 'stuff.': 0.16; 'url:shtml': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'figures': 0.17; '(not': 0.20; 'foundation': 0.20; 'names.': 0.22; 'cheers,': 0.23; 'programming': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'non-profit': 0.29; 'url:non-standard http port': 0.30; 'point': 0.31; 'switch': 0.32; 'getting': 0.33; 'defense': 0.33; 'mass': 0.33; 'up!': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'doing': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'supporting': 0.37; 'being': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'things': 0.38; 'nothing': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'called': 0.39; 'where': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'charset:windows-1256': 0.61; 'more.': 0.62; 'header:Message-Id:1': 0.62; 'respect': 0.63; 'url:%20': 0.63; 'world': 0.63; 'harder': 0.65; 'kids,': 0.65; 'unnecessary': 0.65; 'url:tinyurl': 0.66; 'url:%1': 0.68; 'believe': 0.69; 'smith': 0.71; 'received:204': 0.72; '2013': 0.84; 'cobol': 0.84; 'leo': 0.84; 'received:66.118': 0.84; 'taught': 0.97
X-Spam-Status No, score=-2.1 required=5.0
X-Spam-Level
From Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com>
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: Is Python "venerable"?
Date Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:10:30 -0500
References <roy-198D2A.21455319022013@news.panix.com> <51243E54.8000309@mrabarnett.plus.com>
In-Reply-To <51243E54.8000309@mrabarnett.plus.com>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type Text/Plain; charset="windows-1256"
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2084.1361333875.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 35
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1361333875 news.xs4all.nl 6983 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41321
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:39311

Show key headers only | View raw

On Tuesday 19 February 2013 23:09:11 MRAB did opine:

> On 2013-02-20 02:45, Roy Smith wrote:
> > A quote from Computer World (http://tinyurl.com/bxqjed8):
> > 
> > "... the Python Software Foundation (PSF) - a non-profit supporting
> > the venerable Python programming language ..."
> > 
> > Venerable?  Come on.  Fortran is venerable.  Cobol is venerable.  Old
> > farts use things that are venerable.  I don't want to be an old fart
> > (not that I have much say in the matter).
> > 
> > I use Python because I want to be one of the cool kids, doing new hip
> > stuff.  Has the language really progressed to the point where it's
> > being called "venerable"?  If I want to be one of the cool kids, am I
> > now going to have to switch to Lua or Scala or (please, no)
> > JavaScript?
> 
> I believe that the cools kids don't use the word "hip" any more.

And even us old (78) farts are calling things Kewl now.

Cheers, Gene
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
My web page: <http://coyoteden.dyndns-free.com:85/gene> is up!
My views 
<http://www.armchairpatriot.com/What%20Has%20America%20Become.shtml>
History is nothing but a collection of fables and useless trifles,
cluttered up with a mass of unnecessary figures and proper names.
		-- Leo Tolstoy
I was taught to respect my elders, but its getting 
harder and harder to find any...

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Is Python "venerable"? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-02-19 21:45 -0500
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-02-20 03:09 +0000
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Barry W Brown <brownbar@gmail.com> - 2013-02-19 19:53 -0800
    Re: Is Python "venerable"? Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2013-02-20 16:03 +0000
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-02-19 23:03 -0500
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-20 04:15 +0000
    Re: Is Python "venerable"? rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> - 2013-02-20 11:28 -0800
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2013-02-19 23:10 -0500
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-02-19 20:42 -0800
    Re: Is Python "venerable"? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 09:08 +0000
      Re: Is Python "venerable"? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 20:20 +1100
        Re: Is Python "venerable"? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 02:49 -0800
    Re: Is Python "venerable"? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-02-20 10:19 +0100
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Albert Hopkins <marduk@letterboxes.org> - 2013-02-20 06:03 -0500
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Steve Simmons <square.steve@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 12:35 +0100
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-20 22:45 +1100
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> - 2013-02-20 11:29 -0800
  Re: Is Python "venerable"? Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2013-02-20 10:33 -0500

csiph-web