Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #101207
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Consistent error |
| Date | Mon, 4 Jan 2016 01:47:45 +1100 |
| Lines | 41 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.205.1451832473.11925.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | <6f54629c-745f-4f75-a267-0f174cc1aea1@googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| X-Trace | news.uni-berlin.de gZJwujp8fAq+cGKwwo8yFQBgBEOrwL0xgMAZqfG0hsOQ== |
| Return-Path | <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.006 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.09; 'it;': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'jan': 0.11; 'subject:error': 0.11; 'def': 0.13; 'subsequent': 0.15; '2016': 0.16; 'executed.': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'partly': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'sure.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; 'algorithm': 0.20; 'meant': 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; 'bit': 0.23; 'this:': 0.23; 'second': 0.24; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'mon,': 0.24; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'function': 0.28; 'indentation': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'print': 0.30; 'comments': 0.30; 'code': 0.30; 'largest': 0.31; 'maybe': 0.33; 'problem': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:209.85.213': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.38; 'your': 0.60; 'show': 0.62; 'statement,': 0.66; 'chrisa': 0.84; 'divide': 0.84; 'uncertain': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.91; 'careful': 0.91 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=tWL/N92kJyHSV3ggknsOuSmXuZqx2tPXxbKvpRQwivU=; b=SPRrEW4J4sXhr185GbdQhYGtPal1fGBxAh3F7aF0/hGh2vMQIRGwemBijh7WiApYI6 /E5qWaGRjSUyRq31/jkI+VkhhuOOTkuHymYsPqTCcm7phB0xDu4fELWxBWU1KE7pvm4R sxJkTVaN2lZ8v/qoHEIA+jZlEoZN7FFbURIAZ3wXzb3HFSobPH/NmEIQaK7/40QmZ+ax OAj0bYNzkJ06GByFDh+RnTvvIBSjjFhMgmJ9rHf21QNSxLlaEwG25U0iBEbqC8GevGHV hifdDSrMnXRIa1zRXMPGHxW50xH4F52DHcF/snkpei9GxBUZci2HLEQoifPbreZiN1jo It2w== |
| X-Received | by 10.50.78.70 with SMTP id z6mr31801888igw.92.1451832465549; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 06:47:45 -0800 (PST) |
| In-Reply-To | <6f54629c-745f-4f75-a267-0f174cc1aea1@googlegroups.com> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.20+ |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:101207 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:35 AM, <cc.fezeribe@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's my code in python :
>
> def get_algorithm_result( numlist ):
> largest = numlist[0]
> i = 1
> while ( i < len(numlist) ):
> if ( largest < numlist[i]):
> largest = numlist[i]
> i = i + 1
> numlist[i] = numlist[-1]
> return largest
> numlist = [1,2,3,4,5]
> largest = get_algorithm_result(numlist)
> print largest
> def prime_number(x):
> return len([n for n in range(1, x + 1) if x % n == 0]) <= 2
I'm a bit uncertain of your indentation here, partly because there's
so little of it; what happens in the while loop if the 'if' condition
is false?
After a 'return' statement, nothing will be executed. If you write
code like this:
if some_condition:
do_stuff()
return something
do_more_stuff()
the second call will never happen - the function will immediately bail
out. Maybe you meant for the subsequent code to be unindented? I'm not
sure.
Have a very careful read of your requirements, and try to lay your
code out the exact same way. Put comments against each block of code
to show which part of the required algorithm it's performing. That
way, you divide the problem up some, and you can look at each piece
separately.
ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Consistent error cc.fezeribe@gmail.com - 2016-01-03 06:35 -0800
Re: Consistent error Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 01:47 +1100
Re: Consistent error cc.fezeribe@gmail.com - 2016-01-03 07:59 -0800
Re: Consistent error Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 03:14 +1100
Re: Consistent error cc.fezeribe@gmail.com - 2016-01-03 08:55 -0800
Re: Consistent error Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-01-03 18:22 +0000
Re: Consistent error Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 09:27 -0700
Re: Consistent error cc.fezeribe@gmail.com - 2016-01-03 08:59 -0800
Re: Consistent error iykeluvzu@gmail.com - 2016-01-15 06:15 -0800
csiph-web