Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #88055
| Date | 2015-03-26 10:14 -0400 |
|---|---|
| From | Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> |
| Subject | Re: Sudoku solver |
| References | <87r3sdnw5t.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <mailman.188.1427358005.10327.python-list@python.org> <87fv8sndw1.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <CAPTjJmrq4+W7vgVmZZKnOCFtTy5R27vinD1mFUTEyhaUKA+BuQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.202.1427379292.10327.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 03/26/2015 08:37 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> wrote: >> "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com>: >> >>> Here is another python-based sudoku solver - >>> >>> http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/PADS/Sudoku.py >>> >>> >From its docstring - >>> >>> "A proper Sudoku puzzle must have a unique solution, and it should be >>> possible to reach that solution by a sequence of logical deductions >>> without trial and error. >> >> I don't think that statement holds water. Trial-and-error is at the >> basis of deduction (reductio ad absurdum). The human solver employs it >> in their head. The question is, what is the difference between >> pen-and-paper and in-your-head for a computer program? > > Nothing. And solving a Sudoku puzzle - or any other puzzle - should > require no guessing. It should be possible to solve purely by logic. > Same goes for every other kind of puzzle out there; it's highly > unsatisfying to play Minesweeper and get to the end with a block of > four squares in a corner, two mines left, and no way of knowing which > diagonal has the mines and which is clear. > > No trial-and-error, thanks. I think you're making an unwarranted assumption here. Your Minesweeper example has two solutions, so there's no way of telling which is the "correct" one. But I'd claim that there are puzzles which have exactly one solution, but which need trial and error at some point to find that solution. I'm not sure how to prove it, since somebody could claim that I just haven't tried all the non-trial-and-error rules. I did write a Sudoku-solver many years ago, in C++, and it solved the typical Sudoku I fed it in about 2ms. But it was deliberately written to apply only rules that humans could readily apply. No backtracking. I did not at that time have any electronic source for puzzles, and I got bored with manually entering them in from puzzle books. So I never actually encountered a puzzle it couldn't solve. I mostly used it to determine that a puzzle I couldn't manually solve was in fact uniquely solvable, and that I'd just messed up somehow. I wish I still had that source code, as it probably sounds like I'm blowing smoke here. The general approach I used was to make objects of each of the cells, which tracked its neighbors to decide whether its value was determined. And when it was determined, it notified its other neighbors. In turn, if that decided a value for any of the neighbors, that cell notified its neighbors. Likewise each row or column or box kept track of its state and notified the appropriate cells whenever something interesting was discovered. Then the outer loop just tickled each cell in turn, and the solution rippled out. Maybe I'm misinterpreting your phrase "No trial and error, thanks". Perhaps you're saying that puzzles that require trial and error are no fun to solve for humans. And that's a different matter entirely. I do the daily KenKen puzzles in my local paper, and they're just hard enough to be fun, seldom taking longer than I'm willing to take in the mornings. -- DaveA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Sudoku solver Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-25 13:39 +0200
Re: Sudoku solver John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-03-25 11:44 -0700
Re: Sudoku solver Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 13:05 -0600
Re: Sudoku solver Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-25 21:37 +0200
Re: Sudoku solver Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 14:09 -0600
Re: Sudoku solver Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-25 22:31 +0200
Re: Sudoku solver Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 09:40 +1100
Re: Sudoku solver Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 18:07 -0600
Re: Sudoku solver BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-27 20:04 +0000
Re: Sudoku solver Abhiram R <abhi.darkness@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 08:26 +0530
Re: Sudoku solver Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 21:24 -0600
Re: Sudoku solver Abhiram R <abhi.darkness@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 08:58 +0530
Re: Sudoku solver Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-26 14:13 +0200
Re: Sudoku solver Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-26 16:15 +0200
Re: Sudoku solver albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2015-04-10 23:10 +0000
Re: Sudoku solver Sayth <flebber.crue@gmail.com> - 2015-03-27 20:39 -0700
Re: Sudoku solver BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-28 23:50 +0000
Re: Sudoku solver Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 11:12 +1100
Re: Sudoku solver BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-29 21:59 +0100
Re: Sudoku solver Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-03-29 22:19 +0100
Re: Sudoku solver BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-29 22:59 +0100
Re: Sudoku solver Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-03-29 14:06 +1100
Re: Sudoku solver Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 15:10 +1100
Re: Sudoku solver Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-03-29 21:35 +1100
Re: Sudoku solver Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 21:54 +1100
Re: Sudoku solver BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-29 13:01 +0100
Re: Sudoku solver BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-29 16:23 +0100
Re: Sudoku solver Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-03-29 09:57 +0200
Re: Sudoku solver BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-30 11:54 +0100
Re: Sudoku solver BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-29 12:25 +0100
Re: Sudoku solver Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-29 21:03 +0300
Re: Sudoku solver Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-03-29 19:26 +0100
Re: Sudoku solver Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-29 21:33 +0300
Re: Sudoku solver BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-29 22:11 +0100
Re: Sudoku solver Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 00:50 -0600
Re: Sudoku solver Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-03-30 09:13 +0200
Re: Sudoku solver Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 01:29 -0600
Re: Sudoku solver Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-30 12:16 +0300
Re: Sudoku solver Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-03-30 04:16 -0400
Re: Sudoku solver Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 02:57 -0600
Re: Sudoku solver Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 20:13 +1100
Re: Sudoku solver Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-03-29 22:21 +0100
Re: Sudoku solver BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-29 23:17 +0100
Re: Sudoku solver Seymore4Head <Seymore4Head@Hotmail.invalid> - 2015-03-29 21:40 -0400
Re: Sudoku solver Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-03-26 09:50 +1100
Re: Sudoku solver Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-03-25 23:04 +0000
Re: Sudoku solver Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-03-27 07:40 +0100
Re: Sudoku solver "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-03-26 10:19 +0200
Re: Sudoku solver Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-26 14:26 +0200
Re: Sudoku solver Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 23:37 +1100
Re: Sudoku solver Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 07:15 -0600
Re: Sudoku solver Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-26 16:23 +0200
Re: Sudoku solver Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 09:06 -0600
Re: Sudoku solver Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-26 17:48 +0200
Re: Sudoku solver Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 10:20 -0600
Re: Sudoku solver Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-26 18:47 +0200
Re: Sudoku solver Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-03-26 10:14 -0400
Re: Sudoku solver Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-27 01:41 +1100
Re: Sudoku solver Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-03-26 11:03 -0400
Re: Sudoku solver Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-26 17:42 +0200
Re: Sudoku solver Pete Forman <petef4+usenet@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 22:24 +0000
Re: Sudoku solver Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-27 02:21 +1100
Re: Sudoku solver Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-03-26 20:42 -0400
Re: Sudoku solver Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-03-27 09:14 -0400
Re: Sudoku solver Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 00:25 +1100
Re: Sudoku solver "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-03-27 15:35 +0200
Re: Sudoku solver Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-27 15:56 +0200
Re: Sudoku solver Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-03-27 10:09 -0400
Re: Sudoku solver sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2015-03-27 11:18 -0700
Re: Sudoku solver Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-03-28 12:46 +1100
Re: Sudoku solver Larry Hudson <orgnut@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-27 16:48 -0700
Re: Sudoku solver Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 01:07 +1100
Re: Sudoku solver Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 01:19 +1100
Re: Sudoku solver Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2015-03-28 14:13 +1300
Re: Sudoku solver Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-03-28 12:40 +1100
Re: Sudoku solver Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 02:24 -0600
Re: Sudoku solver Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-03-27 16:03 +0000
Re: Sudoku solver Virgil Stokes <vs@it.uu.se> - 2015-03-28 19:36 +0100
Re: Sudoku solver Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-03-27 09:48 -0400
Re: Sudoku solver Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-03-27 09:52 -0400
Re: Sudoku solver Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 00:58 +1100
Re: Sudoku solver mr.smittye@gmail.com - 2015-03-29 16:39 -0700
Re: Sudoku solver Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-03-30 12:24 +0300
csiph-web