Re: Python Worst Practices

Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<python@mrabarnett.plus.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.017
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.97; 'S': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'list?': 0.07; 'utf-8': 0.07; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'from:addr:mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'from:addr:python': 0.16; 'from:name:mrab': 0.16; 'message-id:@mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'received:192.168.1.4': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'example': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; "aren't": 0.24; 'handling': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'but': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'dates': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'numbers': 0.61; 'entire': 0.61; 'telephone': 0.63; 'zip': 0.64; 'world': 0.66; 'subject:Practices': 0.84
X-CM-Score	0.00
X-CNFS-Analysis	v=2.1 cv=Ms/c6gqe c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:117 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:17 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=mlFM_a_ONtUA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=EBOSESyhAAAA:8 a=Bi6GNO_xAAAA:8 a=lh1JHvi0mSL-KAd8dJsA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=dKat95RQKtgA:10
X-AUTH	mrabarnett@:2500
Date	Wed, 25 Feb 2015 21:28:10 +0000
From	MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com>
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version	1.0
To	python-list@python.org
Subject	Re: Python Worst Practices
References	<mclca6$iie$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To	<mclca6$iie$1@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.19219.1424899701.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	16
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1424899701 news.xs4all.nl 2919 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46142
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:86443

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2015-02-25 20:45, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> http://www.slideshare.net/pydanny/python-worst-practices
>
> Any that should be added to this list?  Any that be removed as not that bad?
>
We don't have numeric ZIP codes in the UK, but the entire world has
numeric telephone numbers, so that might be a better example of numbers
that aren't really numbers.

Numeric dates can be ambiguous: dd/mm/yyyy or mm/dd/yyyy? The ISO
standard is clearer: yyyy-mm-dd.

Handling text: "Unicode sandwich".

UTF-8 is better than legacy encodings.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Python Worst Practices MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2015-02-25 21:28 +0000
  Re: Python Worst Practices Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-02-25 23:00 +0000
  Re: Python Worst Practices wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2015-02-25 23:03 -0800

csiph-web