Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.017 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'list?': 0.07; 'utf-8': 0.07; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'from:addr:mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'from:addr:python': 0.16; 'from:name:mrab': 0.16; 'message-id:@mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'received:192.168.1.4': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'example': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; "aren't": 0.24; 'handling': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'but': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'dates': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'numbers': 0.61; 'entire': 0.61; 'telephone': 0.63; 'zip': 0.64; 'world': 0.66; 'subject:Practices': 0.84 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Ms/c6gqe c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:117 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:17 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=mlFM_a_ONtUA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=EBOSESyhAAAA:8 a=Bi6GNO_xAAAA:8 a=lh1JHvi0mSL-KAd8dJsA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=dKat95RQKtgA:10 X-AUTH: mrabarnett@:2500 Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 21:28:10 +0000 From: MRAB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Python Worst Practices References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1424899701 news.xs4all.nl 2919 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46142 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:86443 On 2015-02-25 20:45, Mark Lawrence wrote: > http://www.slideshare.net/pydanny/python-worst-practices > > Any that should be added to this list? Any that be removed as not that bad? > We don't have numeric ZIP codes in the UK, but the entire world has numeric telephone numbers, so that might be a better example of numbers that aren't really numbers. Numeric dates can be ambiguous: dd/mm/yyyy or mm/dd/yyyy? The ISO standard is clearer: yyyy-mm-dd. Handling text: "Unicode sandwich". UTF-8 is better than legacy encodings.