Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #86118

Re: Design thought for callbacks

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!nerim.net!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.026
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.95; '*S*': 0.00; 'say,': 0.05; '*not*': 0.07; 'callback': 0.09; 'references.': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python- list': 0.11; '23,': 0.16; 'bind': 0.16; 'bucket': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'magic': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'meant': 0.20; 'seems': 0.21; 'feb': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'button,': 0.24; 'mon,': 0.24; '(or': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'sort': 0.25; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "d'aprano": 0.31; 'steven': 0.31; 'yes.': 0.31; 'themselves': 0.32; 'becomes': 0.33; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'doing': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'wrong': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'button': 0.38; 'fact': 0.38; 'expect': 0.39; 'itself': 0.39; 'around.': 0.60; 'no.': 0.61; 'more': 0.64; 'subject:Design': 0.78; '2015': 0.84; 'listener': 0.84; 'reference),': 0.84; 'subject:thought': 0.84; 'thing,': 0.91; 'to:none': 0.92
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=jU399dLFiQwe5Aq84Yoc4YzCrK9jG0d1OtMD9M6VGxw=; b=xPB5ZT1IC8vsDo90+n/kjxJb5q7MSQrzapKKqxL0zgpkTmf1Aaf5osah9F+qeGyBor 2Rq3LzCG5XfcYwnLMoMRtfqNubmsNe/1aMsr2qc7fxh4x6i90whIgK95xSlXSBymbuyJ tlnEEj/PIjGZrboMTKIsx9McGio2RQ51w5Redr9T5UM0tww2Pzg2KqrOMWKMeIFh7uj+ OdZz7Jq+baPNfY1Jyq48PVOXj92IWyJ8TECqNqKMFW5chnwl0Qbgx4g3QubJaEXPPUPD NP91/SZI0IsYYliY3QGULisYO4JzUaa2SQTqeflr2E4tDBGtaCey8u2FUiWnxCEEFe6i pVGA==
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Received by 10.42.64.197 with SMTP id h5mr7086434ici.12.1424613667003; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 06:01:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To <54e9dd8e$0$12975$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
References <33677AE8-B2FA-49F9-9304-C8D93784255D@gmail.com> <CAPTjJmpEHQV2PpaZvszuTGn0_GNg0sWV6aLenbQsZrSXCy2YKQ@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.18957.1424524392.18130.python-list@python.org> <mcargl$h3k$1@reader1.panix.com> <87egpjapxv.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <54e9391b$0$13010$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.18985.1424571107.18130.python-list@python.org> <54e95d34$0$13006$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.18986.1424586063.18130.python-list@python.org> <54e9b027$0$12992$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.18999.1424603679.18130.python-list@python.org> <54e9dd8e$0$12975$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
Date Mon, 23 Feb 2015 01:01:06 +1100
Subject Re: Design thought for callbacks
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Cc "python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.19012.1424613675.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 24
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1424613675 news.xs4all.nl 2835 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44211
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:86118

Show key headers only | View raw

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Steven D'Aprano
<steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote:
>> No no no. It's the other way around. _Something_ has to be doing those
>> callbacks, and it's that _something_ that should be keeping them
>> alive. The fact that it's a registered callback should itself *be* a
>> reference (and not a weak reference), and should keep it alive.
>
> That's much more reasonable than what you said earlier:
>
>     it seems wrong to have to stash a thing in a bucket in order
>     to keep its callbacks alive. I expect the callbacks themselves to
>     keep it alive.
>
>
> So yes. If I bind a callback to a button, say, or a listener, then the
> button (or listener) keeps the callback alive, *not* the callback keeping
> the button or listener alive.

I meant the same thing, but my terminology was poor. Yes, that's
correct; it's not any sort of magic about it being a callback, but
more that the one you register it with becomes the owner of something.
Hence, no weak references.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Design thought for callbacks Cem Karan <cfkaran2@gmail.com> - 2015-02-21 08:13 -0500
  Re: Design thought for callbacks Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-02-21 20:57 +0000
    Re: Design thought for callbacks Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-02-21 23:57 +0200
      Re: Design thought for callbacks Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-02-22 13:04 +1100
        Re: Design thought for callbacks Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-02-22 13:11 +1100
          Re: Design thought for callbacks Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-02-22 15:38 +1100
            Re: Design thought for callbacks Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-02-22 17:21 +1100
              Re: Design thought for callbacks Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-02-22 21:32 +1100
                Re: Design thought for callbacks Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-02-22 22:14 +1100
                Re: Design thought for callbacks Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-02-23 00:45 +1100
                Re: Design thought for callbacks Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-02-23 01:01 +1100
        Re: Design thought for callbacks Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-02-22 09:52 +0200
          Re: Design thought for callbacks Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-02-22 19:17 +1100
            Re: Design thought for callbacks Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-02-22 10:34 +0200
              Re: Design thought for callbacks Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-02-22 19:58 +1100
                Re: Design thought for callbacks Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-02-22 11:14 +0200
                Re: Design thought for callbacks Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-02-22 21:21 +1100
                Re: Design thought for callbacks Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-02-22 12:28 +0100
                Re: Design thought for callbacks Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-02-23 00:57 +1100
                Re: Design thought for callbacks Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-02-22 16:06 +0200
    Re: Design thought for callbacks Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-02-22 00:05 -0700
    Re: Design thought for callbacks Cem Karan <cfkaran2@gmail.com> - 2015-02-22 08:21 -0500
      Re: Design thought for callbacks Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2015-02-24 18:20 +1300
        Re: Design thought for callbacks random832@fastmail.us - 2015-02-24 00:29 -0500
          Re: Design thought for callbacks Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2015-02-25 10:19 +1300
            Re: Design thought for callbacks Cem Karan <cfkaran2@gmail.com> - 2015-02-25 07:50 -0500
              Re: Design thought for callbacks Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2015-02-26 18:36 +1300
                Re: Design thought for callbacks Cem Karan <cfkaran2@gmail.com> - 2015-02-26 05:58 -0500
                Re: Design thought for callbacks Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-02-26 12:54 -0700
                Re: Design thought for callbacks Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2015-02-26 12:00 -0800
                Re: Design thought for callbacks Cem Karan <cfkaran2@gmail.com> - 2015-03-02 06:06 -0500
                Re: Design thought for callbacks Cem Karan <cfkaran2@gmail.com> - 2015-03-02 06:04 -0500
                Re: Design thought for callbacks Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-02 08:34 -0700
                Re: Design thought for callbacks Cem Karan <cfkaran2@gmail.com> - 2015-03-08 14:30 -0400

csiph-web