Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #86030

Re: Design thought for callbacks

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <cfkaran2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.016
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; '21,': 0.07; 'debugging': 0.07; 'nasty': 0.07; '"if': 0.09; 'bits': 0.09; 'callback': 0.09; 'naturally': 0.09; 'objects,': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'python': 0.11; 'wrote': 0.14; 'creates': 0.14; 'design?': 0.16; 'garbage': 0.16; 'gotcha.': 0.16; 'skip:n 50': 0.16; 'weird': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'code.': 0.18; 'all,': 0.19; 'not,': 0.20; 'feb': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'earlier': 0.24; 'question': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'first,': 0.26; 'certain': 0.27; 'developing': 0.27; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'tried': 0.27; 'idea': 0.28; 'am,': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'that.': 0.31; 'accidentally': 0.31; 'lies': 0.31; 'themselves': 0.32; 'url:python': 0.33; 'everyone': 0.33; 'could': 0.34; 'problem': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'objects': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'version': 0.36; 'really': 0.36; 'charset:us- ascii': 0.36; 'similar': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'error.': 0.37; 'project': 0.37; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.38; 'url:library': 0.38; 'bad': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'users': 0.40; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'worry': 0.60; 'ago,': 0.61; 'url:3': 0.61; 'simple': 0.61; 'header:Message-Id:1': 0.63; 'kept': 0.65; 'frank': 0.68; 'subject:Design': 0.78; 'inform': 0.78; '3.4': 0.84; 'about?': 0.84; 'comment.': 0.84; 'preventing': 0.84; 'resulted': 0.84; 'situations,': 0.84; 'subject:thought': 0.84; 'bounce': 0.91
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Uolq0zxxGgaDyRzT05oGTiyqEF/ftdkkTB2Y5+YI4/E=; b=cQ/X/+TEnxDgiWC2OLo8G7nsk0CC+tTr4eJpt4q6SM+rW8ZKrch7FlDZ3OrT+GpA2+ 5lfD+0LKsXP9lENXybXOSc84qnhcsmJGEWI9VFoKT4s8vdFCQYbzLgLgTVIsARuzZ8Aw aZIYnnZQqbnjqXZYhIjkysjwFeOnDTeb2aNPaWR+Xt9awcsAFV9RNdX2LVI/nb7do3Ge y2Z06vTzhqF7b5wdnIMlwDXCmWFrw+7kFuy6Mcm8bC6IoCAh3TaGyVMrKZiWotHNbeM7 ovxypgDJZtFFHm3nn6PHLkmfpB4nSv3jm9G3Q6QX65L3B/ZSxuq+eduB2/KAbhe6XKX7 tdMw==
X-Received by 10.140.42.130 with SMTP id c2mr5091056qga.105.1424524444578; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 05:14:04 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Subject Re: Design thought for callbacks
From Cem Karan <cfkaran2@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To <mc95pr$gau$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date Sat, 21 Feb 2015 08:14:03 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
References <33677AE8-B2FA-49F9-9304-C8D93784255D@gmail.com> <mc95pr$gau$1@ger.gmane.org>
To Frank Millman <frank@chagford.com>
X-Mailer Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.18959.1424524867.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 60
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1424524867 news.xs4all.nl 2924 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57884
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:86030

Show key headers only | View raw


On Feb 21, 2015, at 12:41 AM, Frank Millman <frank@chagford.com> wrote:

> 
> "Cem Karan" <cfkaran2@gmail.com> wrote in message 
> news:33677AE8-B2FA-49F9-9304-C8D93784255D@gmail.com...
>> Hi all, I'm working on a project that will involve the use of callbacks, 
>> and I want to bounce an idea I had off of everyone to make sure I'm not 
>> developing a bad idea.  Note that this is for python 3.4 code; I don't 
>> need to worry about any version of python earlier than that.
>> 
>> In order to inform users that certain bits of state have changed, I 
>> require them to register a callback with my code.  The problem is that 
>> when I store these callbacks, it naturally creates a strong reference to 
>> the objects, which means that if they are deleted without unregistering 
>> themselves first, my code will keep the callbacks alive.  Since this could 
>> lead to really weird and nasty situations, I would like to store all the 
>> callbacks in a WeakSet 
>> (https://docs.python.org/3/library/weakref.html#weakref.WeakSet).  That 
>> way, my code isn't the reason why the objects are kept alive, and if they 
>> are no longer alive, they are automatically removed from the WeakSet, 
>> preventing me from accidentally calling them when they are dead.  My 
>> question is simple; is this a good design?  If not, why not?
>>  Are there any potential 'gotchas' I should be worried about?
>> 
> 
> I tried something similar a while ago, and I did find a gotcha.
> 
> The problem lies in this phrase - "if they are no longer alive, they are 
> automatically removed from the WeakSet, preventing me from accidentally 
> calling them when they are dead."
> 
> I found that the reference was not removed immediately, but was waiting to 
> be garbage collected. During that window, I could call the callback, which 
> resulted in an error.
> 
> There may have been a simple workaround. Perhaps someone else can comment.

THAT would be one heck of a gotcha!  Must have been fun debugging that one!

Cem Karan

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Design thought for callbacks Cem Karan <cfkaran2@gmail.com> - 2015-02-21 08:14 -0500

csiph-web