Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #86030
| Subject | Re: Design thought for callbacks |
|---|---|
| From | Cem Karan <cfkaran2@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2015-02-21 08:14 -0500 |
| References | <33677AE8-B2FA-49F9-9304-C8D93784255D@gmail.com> <mc95pr$gau$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.18959.1424524867.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Feb 21, 2015, at 12:41 AM, Frank Millman <frank@chagford.com> wrote: > > "Cem Karan" <cfkaran2@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:33677AE8-B2FA-49F9-9304-C8D93784255D@gmail.com... >> Hi all, I'm working on a project that will involve the use of callbacks, >> and I want to bounce an idea I had off of everyone to make sure I'm not >> developing a bad idea. Note that this is for python 3.4 code; I don't >> need to worry about any version of python earlier than that. >> >> In order to inform users that certain bits of state have changed, I >> require them to register a callback with my code. The problem is that >> when I store these callbacks, it naturally creates a strong reference to >> the objects, which means that if they are deleted without unregistering >> themselves first, my code will keep the callbacks alive. Since this could >> lead to really weird and nasty situations, I would like to store all the >> callbacks in a WeakSet >> (https://docs.python.org/3/library/weakref.html#weakref.WeakSet). That >> way, my code isn't the reason why the objects are kept alive, and if they >> are no longer alive, they are automatically removed from the WeakSet, >> preventing me from accidentally calling them when they are dead. My >> question is simple; is this a good design? If not, why not? >> Are there any potential 'gotchas' I should be worried about? >> > > I tried something similar a while ago, and I did find a gotcha. > > The problem lies in this phrase - "if they are no longer alive, they are > automatically removed from the WeakSet, preventing me from accidentally > calling them when they are dead." > > I found that the reference was not removed immediately, but was waiting to > be garbage collected. During that window, I could call the callback, which > resulted in an error. > > There may have been a simple workaround. Perhaps someone else can comment. THAT would be one heck of a gotcha! Must have been fun debugging that one! Cem Karan
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Design thought for callbacks Cem Karan <cfkaran2@gmail.com> - 2015-02-21 08:14 -0500
csiph-web