Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #24986

Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <alec.taylor6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.020
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'merging': 0.07; 'added.': 0.09; 'cc:addr:googlegroups.com': 0.09; 'friday,': 0.09; 'received:209.85.213.46': 0.09; 'received:mail- yw0-f46.google.com': 0.09; 'yeah,': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'sat,': 0.15; '1.0a': 0.16; '11:42': 0.16; 'js:': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'message-----': 0.17; 'subject:skip:i 10': 0.22; "i'd": 0.22; 'example': 0.23; 'seems': 0.23; 'thus': 0.24; 'cc:2**1': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.25; 'supported': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'rest': 0.28; 'extending': 0.29; 'far.': 0.29; 'url:developer': 0.29; 'point': 0.31; 'good.': 0.32; 'skip:- 10': 0.32; 'could': 0.32; '(with': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'thanks': 0.34; 'list': 0.35; '2.0': 0.35; 'especially': 0.35; "won't": 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'list.': 0.35; 'subject:': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'cc:no real name:2**1': 0.36; 'email addr:python.org': 0.36; "i'll": 0.36; 'sent:': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'from:': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'google': 0.39; 'little': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'july': 0.60; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'facebook': 0.61; 'email name:python-list': 0.62; 'more': 0.63; 'request.': 0.64; 'jul': 0.65; 'linkedin': 0.65; 'stuck': 0.65; 'box,': 0.69; 'now:': 0.71; '(according': 0.84; 'alec': 0.84
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=grOq0cVC4JGfi1IR6IuswhNZ/2BFN51zpWJwEsPZb+s=; b=HxaE/QgVcBXCSarzLyLXxvsYJ45KxtyE3tymSynE2nSmkmvfWBRblPsm+5RevvbDB7 9eM8craxpm4yFwthDSN2H778/XPiS8DMgyeb16w29dEbRdXX84jhqR8ab5C+YxTgqVyN luLXXBGdvEJpwIH77mTdW1EY8Kw4+C5RiWq5rbKmS3CaT1zeC3EVp6vOg6NtvHdIvJKj 1SuQHVFX9WA8lmHDteK45g9tFMiFPJA+MW1826Xcvjyl6wPJjQbahNAIlIfOyTq0dipc ZT8Kn6+t/q9TULAqyxff99vkoKkdh6hcDAVgOZNdnnD+tghb3f81PSEZKsz49L0vtcUn ZQNA==
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <026401cd5ba8$240fc8e0$6c2f5aa0$@gmail.com>
References <1973354.3.1332816158529.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbae2> <3e023dd6-eb7d-4a7a-b868-bd41d7c69c8b@googlegroups.com> <mailman.1831.1341501584.4697.python-list@python.org> <7f8f94b6-ed63-41ce-8180-83ca96d88ea3@googlegroups.com> <5b061fbe-71eb-43c3-b8e9-ce5b02a9cce7@googlegroups.com> <CAO+9iGdyLCREgRo=Y1AePO-bxBcMASFJ1kCXA5=nMFKDd5uxRA@mail.gmail.com> <026401cd5ba8$240fc8e0$6c2f5aa0$@gmail.com>
Date Sat, 7 Jul 2012 04:58:35 +1000
Subject Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation
From Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com>
To Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc python-list@python.org, comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1871.1341601119.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 47
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1341601119 news.xs4all.nl 6898 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:33767
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:24986

Show key headers only | View raw

Yeah, seems Twitter is still stuck on 1.0a...

But LinkedIn seems to support 1.0a for REST and 2 for JS:
https://developer.linkedin.com/apis

So that could be a definite contender for Sanction support

On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> wrote:
> No worries, thanks for the request.
>
> Unfortunately AFAIK (according to the OAuth provider list on Wikipedia),
> both Twitter and LinkedIn still use OAuth 1.0a, so until they hop on the
> OAuth 2.0 bandwagon, they won't be added.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alec Taylor [mailto:alec.taylor6@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 11:42 AM
> To: Demian Brecht
> Cc: comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com; python-list@python.org
> Subject: Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation
>
> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Supported provider list (with example code) is now:
>> * Facebook
>> * Google
>> * Foursquare
>> * bitly
>> * GitHub
>> * StackExchange
>> * Instagram
>>
>> Other providers may also be supported out of the box, but have been
> untested thus far.
>
> Looking good. Keep adding more to the list!
>
> I'd especially be interesting in seeing the 3-phase Twitter and LinkedIn
> auths added to the list.
>
> Also I'll be extending it a little more at some point to make it
> "friendlier" :P
>
> Thanks for merging my last pull-request,
>
> Alec Taylor
>

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-03-26 19:42 -0700
  Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-03-27 14:11 +1100
    Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-03-26 23:30 -0400
      Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-03-27 14:49 +1100
        Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-03-26 23:57 -0400
          Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-03-27 15:24 +1100
            Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Jack Diederich <jackdied@gmail.com> - 2012-03-27 01:24 -0400
            Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-03-26 22:30 -0700
              Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-03-27 10:18 -0400
                Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-03-27 10:54 -0700
                Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Mark Hammond <skippy.hammond@gmail.com> - 2012-03-28 14:42 +1100
    Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Stuart Bishop <stuart@stuartbishop.net> - 2012-03-27 16:59 +0700
    Socket Error : Address still in use  (Conveting from python 1.5.2 to 2.7.1) Wong Wah Meng-R32813 <r32813@freescale.com> - 2012-03-27 09:41 +0000
    Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Roland Hedberg <roland@catalogix.se> - 2012-03-27 15:36 +0200
  Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-07-05 07:06 -0700
    Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> - 2012-07-06 01:19 +1000
      Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-07-05 10:48 -0700
      Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-07-05 10:48 -0700
        Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-07-06 08:38 -0700
        Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-07-06 08:38 -0700
          Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> - 2012-07-07 04:41 +1000
          RE: OAuth 2.0 implementation "Demian Brecht" <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-07-06 11:49 -0700
          Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> - 2012-07-07 04:58 +1000

csiph-web