Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #22252
| From | Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation |
| Date | 2012-03-27 10:54 -0700 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <23005482.975.1332870880211.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcr5> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <878vimhfdp.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <roy-2E9CB1.23571326032012@news.panix.com> <87zkb2fz7g.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <7909491.0.1332826232743.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbim5> <roy-261DBC.10182627032012@news.panix.com> |
On Tuesday, 27 March 2012 07:18:26 UTC-7, Roy Smith wrote: > In article > <7909491.0.1332826232743.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbim5>, > Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> wrote: > > > OAuth 2.0 is still in draft status (draft 25 is the current one I believe) > > and yes, unfortunately every single server available at this point have > > varying degrees of separation from the actual spec. It's not a > > pseudo-standard, it's just not observed to the letter. Google is the closest > > and Facebook seems to be the farthest away (Stack Exchange is in close second > > due to building theirs to work like Facebook's). > > In practice, OAuth is all about getting your site to work with Facebook. > That is all most web sites care about today because that's where the > money is. The fact that other sites also use OAuth is of mostly > academic interest at this point. > > The next player on the list is Twitter, and they're not even up to using > their own incompatible version of OAuth 2.0. They're still using OAuth > 1.0 (although, I understand, they're marching towards 2.0). Sure, with the initial surge of the Facebook platform, I'm sure there are many more applications that only work with Facebook. However, after the initial gold rush, I'm sure there will be more developers who see the potential power of service aggregation (and not just for feeds ;)). I know I'm one of them. Of course, a lot of these thoughts are around niche markets, but isn't that where the money is? Untapped, niche markets? That's a completely different discussion though and would obviously be quite the thread derailment.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-03-26 19:42 -0700
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-03-27 14:11 +1100
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-03-26 23:30 -0400
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-03-27 14:49 +1100
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-03-26 23:57 -0400
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-03-27 15:24 +1100
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Jack Diederich <jackdied@gmail.com> - 2012-03-27 01:24 -0400
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-03-26 22:30 -0700
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-03-27 10:18 -0400
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-03-27 10:54 -0700
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Mark Hammond <skippy.hammond@gmail.com> - 2012-03-28 14:42 +1100
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Stuart Bishop <stuart@stuartbishop.net> - 2012-03-27 16:59 +0700
Socket Error : Address still in use (Conveting from python 1.5.2 to 2.7.1) Wong Wah Meng-R32813 <r32813@freescale.com> - 2012-03-27 09:41 +0000
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Roland Hedberg <roland@catalogix.se> - 2012-03-27 15:36 +0200
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-07-05 07:06 -0700
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> - 2012-07-06 01:19 +1000
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-07-05 10:48 -0700
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-07-05 10:48 -0700
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-07-06 08:38 -0700
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-07-06 08:38 -0700
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> - 2012-07-07 04:41 +1000
RE: OAuth 2.0 implementation "Demian Brecht" <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-07-06 11:49 -0700
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> - 2012-07-07 04:58 +1000
csiph-web