Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #38926
| References | <511d5caf$0$29973$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.1804.1360929245.2939.python-list@python.org> <511e4077$0$29966$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-15 11:11 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Python trademark under attack -- the PSF needs your help |
| From | Jason Swails <jason.swails@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1815.1360944728.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Steven D'Aprano < steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote: > Giles Coochey wrote: > > [...] > >> If you have documentation of European user groups, trade associations, > >> books, conferences, scans of job advertisements for Python programmers, > >> software that uses some variation of "Python" in the name, etc. your > >> evidence will be helpful in defeating this attempted grab of the Python > >> name. > >> > > Err... > > > http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_1?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=python > > > > One would think that is enough. > > Giles, thank you for taking the time to respond, but I'm sorry to say that > I > don't think your response is helpful. Unless you are a trademark lawyer, > your intuition about how trivially easy this will be is probably not going > to be accurate. > > You would probably think it was presumptuous for a trademark lawyer to > venture an opinion on how easy it is to write some piece of software. The > same applies in reverse. We need to listen to the experts in European > trademark law, those who know what sort of evidence the European Trademark > Office consider meaningful and significant. These people have told the > Python Software Foundation what needs to be done to fight this trademark > application, and trust me, "spend two seconds doing a search on Amazon" is > *not* it. > > Dismissing the trademark grab as: > > > Surely and open/shut case. > > is the simplest way to ensure that the PSF loses their appeal and the right > to the name "Python" in Europe. > > If anyone has the sort of documentary evidence which the PSF has requested, > and can scan and email them to the PSF, that will be helpful. If anyone is > willing and able to donate money to the foundation to help with the legal > expenses, estimated at tens of thousands of dollars, to challenge this > trademark application, that will also be helpful. If you have a blog, > please consider spreading the word. > > The PSF needs all the help it can get, but it needs to be the sort of help > set out here: > > > http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2013/02/python-trademark-at-risk-in-europe-we.html > > If anyone is thinking of doing something trivially easy which anyone can > do, > such as googling "python", trust me, the PSF has already done it. The PSF > is looking for the sort of help that they can't get by typing into a search > engine. If anyone can help, that's great. If you can't help, then please > don't discourage those who can by claiming this is trivial. > I'm not offering much help here, more like wondering aloud. Doesn't Google (not to mention other software companies) have an interest staked in binding the Python name with the Python language? I can't imagine python.co.uk staging a successful campaign against one of the best-known companies in computers (that employs Python's creator, no less). FWIW, Python is becoming more and more popular in the computational life sciences field (do a search for "computational chemistry python" in scholar.google.com, for instance). It is becoming a core part of the software solutions marketed by companies that write programs for this field (e.g. Schrodinger, OpenEye, Accelrys, CCG -- I only know the North American companies). Virtually all of them ship/sell support scripts written in Python and/or provide a Python-based API into their software for easy modification. These companies pitch Python integration into their marketing schemes as a way of selling themselves as easy-to-use, highly flexible/customizable software (with support, obviously). Their biggest customers are big pharmaceutical companies, so I imagine there is a good bit of interest in that sector for defending the Python name for PSF. All the best, Jason
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Python trademark under attack -- the PSF needs your help Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-15 08:52 +1100
Re: Python trademark under attack -- the PSF needs your help Giles Coochey <giles@coochey.net> - 2013-02-15 11:24 +0000
Re: Python trademark under attack -- the PSF needs your help Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-16 01:04 +1100
Re: Python trademark under attack -- the PSF needs your help Giles Coochey <giles@coochey.net> - 2013-02-15 14:17 +0000
Re: Python trademark under attack -- the PSF needs your help Jason Swails <jason.swails@gmail.com> - 2013-02-15 11:11 -0500
Re: Python trademark under attack -- the PSF needs your help Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2013-02-15 09:09 -0800
Re: Python trademark under attack -- the PSF needs your help Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2013-02-15 13:15 +0100
Re: Python trademark under attack -- the PSF needs your help Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-16 14:53 +1100
Re: Python trademark under attack -- the PSF needs your help Quint Rankid <qbr567@gmail.com> - 2013-02-15 20:06 -0800
Re: Python trademark under attack -- the PSF needs your help llanitedave <llanitedave@veawb.coop> - 2013-02-15 21:17 -0800
Python trademark - A request for civility Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-16 16:48 +1100
Re: Python trademark - A request for civility Michael Poeltl <michael.poeltl@univie.ac.at> - 2013-02-16 11:02 +0100
csiph-web