Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #109528

Re: Operator precedence problem

Path csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!newsfeed0.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Operator precedence problem
Date Sun, 5 Jun 2016 17:47:57 -0600
Lines 14
Message-ID <mailman.18.1465170488.2306.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <816c651a-d0ae-4e23-a5b2-72a8f7398468@googlegroups.com> <nj0kol$ps$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.5.1465112166.2306.python-list@python.org> <3ff71354-461a-4635-8d1a-c879243e39a8@googlegroups.com> <CAMQ2MsFfxF0wSL_y9tSFCoJ1BJ+GVqi2qJLTBzs7+BbGRjW3Bw@mail.gmail.com> <d8a961ba-8339-9aa3-6501-9dff0990362a@gmail.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de woSCpokfQYd9Wsh0jQtskgJ6YDFEtmhuqGnx1nQ54xdw==
Return-Path <torriem+gmail@torriefamily.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.002
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'operator': 0.03; 'bug.': 0.07; 'expressions': 0.07; 'precedence': 0.09; '10:05': 0.16; 'division,': 0.16; 'expect,': 0.16; 'expressions,': 0.16; 'extraneous': 0.16; 'from:addr:torriem': 0.16; 'from:name:michael torrie': 0.16; 'parentheses': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'language': 0.19; 'parse': 0.22; 'subject:problem': 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; '(or': 0.23; 'second': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'tend': 0.27; 'arithmetic': 0.29; 'division': 0.29; 'certainly': 0.30; 'guess': 0.31; 'rules': 0.31; 'implement': 0.32; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.34; 'add': 0.34; "isn't": 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'basic': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'things': 0.38; 'received:192': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'more': 0.63; 'owing': 0.84
X-Virus-Scanned amavisd-new at torriefamily.org
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0
In-Reply-To <CAMQ2MsFfxF0wSL_y9tSFCoJ1BJ+GVqi2qJLTBzs7+BbGRjW3Bw@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.22
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <d8a961ba-8339-9aa3-6501-9dff0990362a@gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Original-References <816c651a-d0ae-4e23-a5b2-72a8f7398468@googlegroups.com> <nj0kol$ps$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.5.1465112166.2306.python-list@python.org> <3ff71354-461a-4635-8d1a-c879243e39a8@googlegroups.com> <CAMQ2MsFfxF0wSL_y9tSFCoJ1BJ+GVqi2qJLTBzs7+BbGRjW3Bw@mail.gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:109528

Show key headers only | View raw

On 06/05/2016 10:05 AM, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
> My suggestion: Never write expressions, such as  2 ** 3 ** 2 or even 2 * 4
> + 5, without parentheses. Always add parentheses - 2 ** (3 ** 2) (or (2 **
> 3) **2) or (2 * 4) + 5 (or 2 * (4 + 5)).

I can understand using parenthesis when operator precedence isn't
working the way you want or expect, but I certainly would not recommend
using it for basic arithmetic with multiplication, division, addition
and subtraction. The rules of precedence for multiplication and division
are well known and well-understood. If a language failed to implement
them that would be a bug.  I think for the simple things extraneous
parenthesis makes expressions more difficult for a human to parse
because he will tend to second guess himself owing to extra parens.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 23:53 -0700
  Re: Operator precedence problem Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-06-05 09:35 +0200
    Re: Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 08:05 -0700
      Re: Operator precedence problem Uri Even-Chen <uri@speedy.net> - 2016-06-05 19:05 +0300
        Re: Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 20:24 -0700
        Re: Operator precedence problem Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 22:46 -0700
          Re: Operator precedence problem Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-06-06 09:57 -0400
            Re: Operator precedence problem Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-06-06 17:22 +0300
              Re: Operator precedence problem Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-06-06 10:35 -0400
                Re: Operator precedence problem Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-06-06 17:55 +0300
              Re: Operator precedence problem Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-06-06 15:03 +0000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-06-06 18:22 +0300
                Re: Operator precedence problem Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-06-06 15:27 +0000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 01:57 +1000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-06-06 16:05 +0000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 02:21 +1000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-06-06 17:02 +0000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 16:51 +0000
              Re: Operator precedence problem Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-06-06 18:38 +0200
            Re: Operator precedence problem Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-06-07 03:07 +1000
              Re: Operator precedence problem Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-06-06 14:44 -0400
                Re: Operator precedence problem Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-06-06 21:49 +0300
              Re: Operator precedence problem MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2016-06-06 20:17 +0100
                Re: Operator precedence problem Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-06-07 11:27 +1200
            Re: Operator precedence problem Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 10:14 -0700
              Re: Operator precedence problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-06-06 21:09 +0100
      Re: Operator precedence problem Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 17:47 -0600
        Re: Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 20:23 -0700
  Re: Operator precedence problem Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 02:24 +1000
    Re: Operator precedence problem Peter Pearson <pkpearson@nowhere.invalid> - 2016-06-06 16:58 +0000
      Re: Operator precedence problem Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-06-07 11:21 +1200
  Re: Operator precedence problem Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-06-05 13:19 -0400
    Re: Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 20:23 -0700
  Re: Operator precedence problem Gary Herron <gherron@digipen.edu> - 2016-06-05 00:04 -0700

csiph-web